Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Perle is no friend to the Bush Administration and with his now multiple financial scandals, should be fired ASAP.

"I think in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing."

"international law ... would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone",

1 posted on 11/20/2003 6:10:33 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: mr.pink; Burkeman1
Can you believe this guy?

Look at those quotes given to a foreign audience; what the hell is he up to?
2 posted on 11/20/2003 6:11:50 AM PST by JohnGalt ("Nothing happened on 9/11 to make the federal government more competent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
I have a different interpretation of this comment. I don't read "the war was illegal" - I read "the concept of international law is a useless, meaningless joke."
3 posted on 11/20/2003 6:13:02 AM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
To quote Ann Coulter, "Look, let's be honest, International law is whatever the United States and Britain says it is."


8 posted on 11/20/2003 6:16:04 AM PST by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
If you read Perle's statement you see that he is absolutely correct and the breathless headline is as usual biased in it's interpretation.

Either we respect our national security mandate or we bow to international law.....WHICH IS IT GOING TO BE!!!

10 posted on 11/20/2003 6:17:09 AM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
This article is a pile of garbage and the quotes certainly don't justify the headline. Just another attempt at Bush bashing.
11 posted on 11/20/2003 6:17:54 AM PST by Queen of Excelsior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
I will believe 'international law' exists when I can dial I-911 and get the international police. But even then, I wouldn't necessarily think it was a good thing.
14 posted on 11/20/2003 6:18:34 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
What's funny is you try to present this as a serious article to slam the Bush administration and peddle your lefty screed, as if it were some concession that the war was "illegals" -- the leftist mantra.

But it is a criticism of so-called international law.

The first sentences and premise of the article that the war was illegal and he admitted it is lie and distorts what was said as well -- a tip off to the leftist agenda driven piece.

If you believe there is or should be some sort of global super entity with authority over the US you'd like this article.

15 posted on 11/20/2003 6:18:55 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
"They're just not interested in international law, are they?" said Linda Hugl

Nope. Glad you dimwits finally got that through your thick skulls.

17 posted on 11/20/2003 6:20:57 AM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
It doesn't take much intellectual horsepower to go through the exercise: What is international law?
To whom does it apply?
Who enforces it?

I have a strong feeling that for any normal person, viewing "international law" against the backdrop of the real world, his head would explode.

There is something about official diplomacy that is not quite real.

18 posted on 11/20/2003 6:21:55 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Well, by saying that international law doesn't matter if we need to defend ourselves, Perle is making a point.

But actually there are good grounds to say that we DID have international law on our side. We had the UN mandate to do whatever it took to make Saddam behave. France may have vetoed further action, but that was enough to work with--and far more than clinton had when he attacked Yugoslavia with NO UN mandate whatever.

Moreover if you take traditional definitions of International Law seriously, International Law corresponds with Natural Law, as argued by Hugo Grotius, who is still recognized as a major authority in this area. And Natural Law recognizes the Christian principle of Just War, when ordinary diplomatic means have been exhausted, as they certainly were.

So this was still a foolish thing for Perle to have said.
23 posted on 11/20/2003 6:26:18 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Are you familiar with The Guardian?
25 posted on 11/20/2003 6:29:35 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
There is no controlling legal authority.
27 posted on 11/20/2003 6:34:44 AM PST by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Legal War is sooo much nicer, gentler and kinder than illegal War now isn't it? LoL.
32 posted on 11/20/2003 6:39:07 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Interesting, very interesting.
If the justification for attacking Iraq was based on violations of international law, and the attack was in violation of those self-same laws there seems to be little use for international law. Perhaps it should be stated that the only operative laws are those of the jungle (maybe Mao was right - choke - truth & power eminate from the barrel of a gun).
34 posted on 11/20/2003 6:42:55 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Perle is no friend to the Bush Administration and with his now multiple financial scandals, should be fired ASAP.

If President Bush feels the same way you do, I'm sure we'll all know it soon enough. I have a feeling he does not.

36 posted on 11/20/2003 6:44:30 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
If anyone here cares about the Constitution, ONLY Congress can declare war; which they failed to do.

Cheers, all.
41 posted on 11/20/2003 6:55:39 AM PST by lodwick (Wake up, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
This article came from the Guardian.

Given the quote and how it relates to the headline - I'm suprised that it didn't come from the Onion.

This guy is reaching.

42 posted on 11/20/2003 7:00:29 AM PST by Conservomax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
War critics astonished as US hawk admits invasion was illegal

Illegal in terms of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Fortunately, the U.S. rightly ignores the leftists on the international court.

43 posted on 11/20/2003 7:00:44 AM PST by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
Just exactly where are "international law" ratified and codified at? I'd really love to look into those "laws".
Where is the repository of these "laws" deemed to govern the whole world?
51 posted on 11/20/2003 7:10:34 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
How is it illegal when we had previous war with the regime of Iraq and they did not live up to the deal that ended that war? Perle has gone mad. For him to say something so stupid, it's inexcusable.
56 posted on 11/20/2003 7:26:30 AM PST by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson