Replies

I wouldn't read that into the comment. If the instructor knew or believed the Government was involved in it - that would lead to the same conversation. This is one of the things you have to be careful to put in context and examine carefully.

Based on what is known to date, I'd say that the corsicans did it and that Christian David is the lynchpin. The testimony there is credible. It fits the facts. It fits the workings of the group in Dallas and New Orleans. It fits the profile for the way the US handles hiring foriegners for assassinations. To me, it resolves all the issues of the evidence without causing any real questions to arise that can't be answered.

Bobby himself was involved partially in the coverup due to national security reasons. But that doesn't by far explain it all. The coverup was in full swing by the time Kennedy reached Parkland. The limo was pulled from sight the moment it was pointed out that there was a hole in the windshield of the car. There was only one person with the authority to make that kind of call on the ground in Dallas, and that was Johnson. If the SS did it on their own, then the level of complicity is exposed in that action.
The history of what happened to the Limo smacks of coverup from the outset.

The coverup was in full swing by the time Kennedy reached Parkland.

It astonishes me to see how quickly the cover-up was in play. I honestly was shocked. This was so well-planned by whoever among the several suspected factions did it.

The history of what happened to the Limo smacks of coverup from the outset.

Agreed.

I agree with you 100% that the Marseille connection, as it was exhaustively covered on THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY, is the most plausible, at least as far as the actual assassins are concerned--the actual triggermen having no particular ax to grind politically one way or another with anyone,and merely fulfilling a professional contract as killers who do what they're good at. The main researcher cited in that segment, whose name I remember to be Steve Revell, I haven't been able to find any other info on. And yes, you are absolutely right in highlighting the fact that the coverup was in full swing virtually from the beginning, a fact that cannot be overemphasized, since it points out that the conspiracy to kill Kennedy and the conspiracy to cover up what would be evidence are not necessarily two separate phenomena with the latter undertaken strictly, say, to cover the ass of an embarrassed FBI, which failed to "protect the President".