[rightofthefairway]

I've watched the history channel a bunch this week but it seems that each episode contradicts the next. I loved the one when the CIA hired the french hitmen made me laugh.

[Havoc]

These people are working independantly and largely in ignorance of the findings of everyone else. They are drawing conclusions based on the part which they know.
The interesting view is when you remove the conclusions of the individuals, line up what they each contribute and put it all together based on those contributed facts. That is something A&E has not done. One of Johnson's thugs left a fingerprint on a box on the sixth floor of the book depository. Doesn't make him the shooter or a shooter. But it proves he was there. The CIA back then did hire assasins both foriegn and domestic for particular jobs. This isn't a trade secret, it is a known fact.

What I find amazing is how people can be so ignorant of reality as to poke fun at reality under the pretense that anyone who hasn't drank the rosy world koolaid is a crackpot or something. The house select committee says 4 shots and at least two shooters. Who do you suppose was the second shooter? I'd love to hear a response given you have accepted the original lie hook line and sinker. Who was it?