Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: auzerais
"George W. Bush's visit to London this week will be historic for at least two reasons. He will be the first U.S. president to come to Britain on a state visit."

.....Maybe I'm mistaken, but I seem to recall a visit by Reagan to Britain. Could someone explain this to me?

"But what if a U.S. withdrawal means the return of the Taliban and Saddam Hussein? "Anything would be better than American Imperialist rule," she snapped back. "

So she is actively working against the British / American Governments during Wartime. Isn't that treason? Weren't the Rosenburgs given the chair for that?
64 posted on 11/20/2003 1:17:10 PM PST by uncbuck ("Lady, I'm not an athlete, I'm a baseball player." -- John Kruk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: uncbuck
Maybe I'm mistaken, but I seem to recall a visit by Reagan to Britain. Could someone explain this to me?

I saw it explained somewhere that it is a "state" visit if the queen invites you & not someone in the government.

70 posted on 11/20/2003 2:03:30 PM PST by mollynme (cogito, ergo freepum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: uncbuck
This is an "Official State Visit" which means the Queen Herself made the invitation. It's seems a little blurry, but that is why this has to have some significance greater than Airforce One landing at Heathrow.

On top of which, this took over two years to plan.

80 posted on 11/20/2003 3:23:05 PM PST by jonascord (Don't bother to run, you'll only die tired...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson