To: pollywog
Everyone's worried that Greer will rule in MS's favor again, this time about the bone scan.
I take heart from a statement Greer is reported to have made on Nov. 22, 2002:
"The court concludes that while it might be interesting to pursue the issue of trauma as it may have occurred almost 12 years ago, that has nothing to do with Theresa Marie Schiavo in 2002."
The sentence in full is very discouraging, yes. But isolate this: "while it might be interesting to pursue the issue of trauma..."
This is more encouragement than most folks get from a judge ruling against them. In an offhand way he is implying that the Schindlers ought to pursue the issue. Saying that from the bench must have sent an awful chill down Schiavo's spine.
To: Graymatter
Everyone's worried that Greer will rule in MS's favor again, this time about the bone scan. I take heart from a statement Greer is reported to have made on Nov. 22, 2002: "The court concludes that while it might be interesting to pursue the issue of trauma as it may have occurred almost 12 years ago, that has nothing to do with Theresa Marie Schiavo in 2002."
I guess it is all in how you look at it.(cup half emtpy/half full)
You can take that statement and conclude that Greer is acknowledging the possibility of trauma in regards to the scans, but he then concludes with the statement " that has nothing to do with Terri in 2002"...so wouldn't you then have to say by this added comment/ruling he is saying " so what, it doesnt matter"? I am hoping tomorrow will prove you right. I PRAY SO....with all my heart.
156 posted on
11/19/2003 9:21:37 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson