To: longtermmemmory
The Republicans on that committee are very strong on social issues, I believe. And most hail from districts that are Very pro-marriage (Alabama, Tennessee, suburban/rural Virginia . . .)
8 posted on
11/19/2003 12:22:27 PM PST by
JohnnyZ
(D-R-E-I-E-R . . . . . . H-U-M-P-H-R-E-Y-S)
To: JohnnyZ
The point is that it's none of the national government's concern. This issue belongs to the separate and sovereign states under the 10th Amendment. The same should be said about laws of sodomy. SCOTUS ignored the 10th Amendment on that one too, all in the name of inclusion
10 posted on
11/19/2003 12:31:58 PM PST by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: JohnnyZ
I understand the author's contention that FMA would be too long and difficult, but I don't understand what it is he does want to do. Can you or someone else explain it?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson