Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oberon
I have a SAR in 5.45x39, and I shudder to think of what the deer would look like after getting hit with one of those rounds. Regardless, if I want a foot-wide exit hole in my trophy, that is my prerogative.
29 posted on 11/19/2003 12:02:31 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: July 4th
I have a SAR in 5.45x39

Which has ballistics similar to the 5.56 NATO round, depending on which version of each basic type one is speaking of. The round probably wouldn't even exit, depending on shot placement of course. It could tear up a lot of meat though. Both the 5.45 and 5.56 (.223) are designed to yaw after striking flesh. (they become hydrodynamically unstable). They also often break up. The 5.56 is slightly heavier and slightly faster, but not enough to really matter much, at least until you go to the newer 62gr 5.56, which then are slighly slower than the 53gr 5.45 rounds. (All in their military loadings) See Wound Ballistics

Bottom line, your 5.45x39 is no more appropriate for larger sized deer than the 5.56, although both will do the job if you can do yours.

36 posted on 11/19/2003 12:21:21 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson