[DCBryan1]

Reasons this case is different from 1993 case:

1) CA law changed (regarding child testimony). Legislature changed law b/c of MJ 1993 case.
2) No warrant issued in 1993. CHARGES WILL BE FILED AGAINST JACKSON THIS TIME FOR MULTIPLE COUNTS.
3)At the time of the investigation in 1993, there was a civil case filed by Feldman in LA....simultaneous with LA CO. criminal investigation and it COMPROMISED investigation. As to date no civil charges to hinder case.
4) We have a very cooperative victim in this case.

[DCBryan1]

RUMOR CONTROL:

1) Warrants delayed during Halloween.
2) His release of new CD has NO effect on investigation and is a "bunk" arguement".
3) Regarding Child Protective Services= Not involved at this time, BUT........looking into it in regard to his own children. It is up to local Santa Barbara people to look into the petition to appoint council and guardian to MJ's children.
4) Copies of factual news releases are now being distributed, along with department releases.

[hispanarepublicana]

We have a very cooperative victim in this case<p< And, yet, there's little part of me that's asking, as I did in the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping.....WHAT IN THE WORLD WERE THE PARENTS THINKING? (allowing Jackson access to the kid/bringing an indigent into their home to paint)