[whattajoke]

To believe in spontaneous generation requires, in my opinion, far more faith than the creationist, for the creationist stipulates that forces were in action that cannot be explained or understood. The evolutionist asserts that the laws governing matter, energy, thermodynamics, and biology as we know them all today, were at multiple points apparently violated, yet not by a being that had the ability to do so (a Creator.) We are to believe they were simply violated in spite of all known observations to the contrary. That is not science. That is faith.

Y'know, you could save a lot of time and simply post, "I wish to post easily refuted erroneous creationist blather here. since this has all been posted and answered several thousand times on FR alone, I'll let you, dear reader, respond as you would to typical easily refuted creationist blather. Good day."

Just cut and paste that paragraph and use it on every crevo thread henceforth. I am here to serve.

[RightWingNilla]

Y'know, you could save a lot of time and simply post, "I wish to post easily refuted erroneous creationist blather here.

What are the odds that the sausage king of Chicago will actually address the evidence that Vade gives in post#72?

[anguish]

Standard form 4814B-34 ("Creo-debunk form")

Now that I have		Check one: O  disproved Ø  demolished O  annihilated
your		Check one: Ø  silly O  insane O  demonic	Check one: O  claim O  screed Ø  rant
would you please		Check one: O  go O  crawl Ø  slither
away, and spare us any more of your		Check one: O  uninformed Ø  dogmatic O  deranged
nonsense

© Darwin Central Command (DCC)

[developed from a PatrickHenry (DCC pingmeister) draft]