To: Frank_Discussion; Hillary's Lovely Legs
I have nothing to hide, and I would do the same thing. The Fed has no business how much money I withdraw from my account, and I imagine Rush feels the same.Yeah, but Rush did have something to hide - a multiyear addiction to painkillers that he was apparently buying off the street, in violation of state and federal law.
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Oh, are you his lawyer? So you've got the inside scoop on the whole case? You've been party to Rush's tearful confession to such activity?
The story hasn't been told yet, y'know.
We all have something to hide, and Rush's money withdrawals may have been hiding something quite legitimate. If it's a legal use for the money, he has the right to keep it secret.
52 posted on
11/19/2003 9:53:10 AM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Yeah, but Rush did have something to hide - a multiyear addiction to painkillers that he was apparently buying off the street, in violation of state and federal law.Please explain how this relates to the allegation of "money laundering".
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Yeah, but Rush did have something to hide - a multiyear addiction to painkillers that he was apparently buying off the street, in violation of state and federal law. Considering the street value for most of those pills (hydrocodone or oxycodone, not oxycontin) is a couple of dollars a pill, he wouldn't have needed tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy those drugs.
57 posted on
11/19/2003 9:55:09 AM PST by
TomB
To: Chancellor Palpatine
If a say, half assed two bit cybersexing, smearing sneaky attorney was spending his time during the day posting on the Internet while at the same time billing clients for "work" on their cases, and then sent a bill for said work thru the US mail would that constitute Mail Fraud?
62 posted on
11/19/2003 9:57:36 AM PST by
Area51
(RINO hunter!)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Yeah, but Rush did have something to hide - a multiyear addiction to painkillers that he was apparently buying off the street, in violation of state and federal law.Careful, Chancellor. I might remind you of the laws against libel. We don't want to expose FR and Jim Rob or yourself for that matter to a libel suit from Rush. Please stop repeating the unsubstatiated rumor that Rush obtained the painkillers illegally.
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Most likely that is what Rush was doing with the money - his walking around money as I think he called it. It was up to the third party to "launder" it. He ought to have listened to the little bell in his head that rang when the bank told him he could safely withdrawal that much money in cash. That what debit and Visa debit/credit cards are for.
147 posted on
11/19/2003 10:40:04 AM PST by
chouli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson