Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkinsaw; Physicist; Light Speed; Starwind
Bump. T

AK. Thanks for the publications list! O. Manuel sure has been slogging through. The meteorite evidence is suggestive. With the alternative 'neutron-star remnant core' solar composition hypothesis, I imagine there is a lot of heated discussion going on at the blackboards. Has anybody attempted to find additional evidence of the 'superfluid' or 'superconductive' iron through re-evaluation of solar spectra? Or is the coronsphere and solar wind purely a phenomena of the outer shell gases...and would they completely mask all evidence of inner composition? What about the rotational dynamics? I.e., the notion of the neutron core spinning to account for the planetary orbital dynamics. Does the current rate of solar rotation track with the rest of the planetary system? Or is there a plausible discontinuity between the neutron core rotation rate and the external layers of gas? The explanation of the theory for planetary composition sure makes intuitive sense.

126 posted on 11/21/2003 8:58:56 AM PST by Paul Ross (Don't get mad. Get madder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross
For those reading along this thread;

Sun is Electric...it is an Anode

Electric Galaxies
Snippets:


The kind of electric discharge I conceive to be responsible for solar radiation must necessarily be driven by an electric potential in interstellar space--a condition to be expected in a galaxy electrified by the separation of charges on a truly magnificent scale.
Just such a situation is postulated by Bruce, who explains the spiral arms of our galaxy as electrical discharges initiated by the breakdown of a radial electric field extending through the entirety of galactic space. And just such a situation could provide the enormously high space potential (negative) that the discharge hypothesis requires.

As I see it, then, the sun, already negatively charged to an extremely high electric potential, behaves as an anode and collects more negative charge because its interstellar environment has a potential that is even higher, in the negative sense. It is a matter of relative potentials.

By analogy with electrical discharges studied in the laboratory, we can predict certain conditions that should prevail in interplanetary space if the sun is indeed fueled electrically. For now, I would mention only this: The interplanetary medium near the earth seems to be characterized by approximately equal numbers of protons and electrons, which fact identifies it as a true plasma. Farther out--say, near the orbit of Jupiter--the protons should be traveling away from the sun with considerably increased velocities, and the electrons should be present in lesser numbers than the protons.

Electric Sun

The Sun, our Variable Star, Nov/2003

127 posted on 11/21/2003 10:56:39 AM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: Paul Ross

What you said.


135 posted on 03/13/2005 8:02:39 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson