Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yonif
We're told that Islam is somehow inconsistent with a democratic culture, yet more than half of the world's Muslims are today contributing citizens in democratic societies.

It is suggested that the poor, in their daily struggles, care little for self-government, yet the poor especially need the power of democracy to defend themselves against corrupt elites.

People from the Middle East share a high civilization, a religion of personal responsibility and a need for freedom as deep as our own.

It is not realism to suppose that one-fifth of humanity is unsuited to liberty. It is pessimism and condescension, and we should have none of it.

This is the gamble that must be taken, but might well fail.

The question is not simply whether Islam is compatible with a democratic culture, but also whether Islam is compatible with republicanism and pluralism, even in neighboring, non-Islamic nations.

The risk of Islam's ultimate incompatibility with our values is not so small, I'm afraid, as President Bush proposes. However, the experiment in Islamic democracy must be conducted, because the only alternative is a Deathmatch of Civilizations. If the experiment fails, we'll be that much more certain of our subsequent course.

A forward strategy of freedom must also apply to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This is a difficult period in a part of the world that has known many. Yet our commitment remains firm. We seek justice and dignity. We seek a viable, independent state for the Palestinian people, who have been betrayed by others for too long.

The Road Map is the President's tar baby. There will be no peace so long as the lies of the "palestinians" are not confronted. This is an experiment that will most certainly fail.

Achieving peace in the Holy Land is not just a matter of the shape of a border. As we work on the details of peace, we must look to the heart of the matter, which is the need for a viable Palestinian democracy.

Peace will not be achieved by Palestinian rulers who intimidate opposition, who tolerate and profit from corruption and maintain their ties to terrorist groups. These are the methods of the old elites, who time and again have put their own self-interest above the interests of the people they claim to serve.

The problem is that terror, intimidation, corruption and oppression are the methods of Mohammed.

That's the dark heart of the matter.


16 posted on 11/19/2003 9:28:25 AM PST by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
one must first separate the arguments. islam and democracy vs. arabian world and democracy. with two strikes against.. arabian culture and islam's tendancies toward islamo-facism, is this a gamble we can truly afford. see the daniel pipes article "the case for iraqification" http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1069129373576 and on FR at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1024726/posts.

maybe if we just want to say "we tried" okay but at what cost?
21 posted on 11/19/2003 11:37:53 AM PST by APRPEH (tag you're it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson