To: Sandylapper; Velveeta
Yes,I had missed it.Sorry Vel,it was post #142,from the thread titled,"Squeamish Scott". I thought this morning I had completed reading yesterday's thread, but obviously I hadn't finished it.
66 posted on
11/19/2003 4:10:47 PM PST by
MaggieMay
(A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
To: MaggieMay; All
SP's statements to the press and to AF are definately incriminating and admissible on several grounds. What I find most interesting after ready the transcripts is the deposits of material on Laci's clothing from the autopsy and the foreign clear material found on the hair sample.If the shrink wrap from SP's warehouse and the cement can be linked to the materials described in the autopsy,the DA has a slam dunk in my humble opinion.
67 posted on
11/19/2003 5:03:03 PM PST by
iaf97
To: MaggieMay
Yes, thanks Mags! I did read it. I kept looking for that statement something like, "Yes, I mean no, I didn't do anything to Laci but I know who did". Something like that, right? I thought that remark was in the tapes, but that remark must have been on another tape.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson