[narses]

Ping.

[GreatOne]

Liberal scumbags are very funny people - where you have absolute scientific and medical certainty that life begins at conception, and absolute scientific and medical certainty as to when brain waves start, heartbeat starts, etc., yet they shut their eyes, put their hands over their ears, and shout, "My body, my choice".

On the opposite end, there is absolutely no scientific or medical FACT that homosexual behavior is anything but a developmental behavioral disorder. The closest science get is nothing more than mere hypothesis. And the "studies" that have been done (Hamer's, twins, etc.) were exposed as frauds. Yet, liberal scumbags continue to shut their eyes, put hands over ears, and shout, "It's not a choice". If not, then why not try intensive psycho-therapy (and get better haircuts).

[onyx]

You did a perfect posting job. The bold print tells the tale.

Spiritual violence? These activists are quick, aren't they? A new "buzz" term hath been born.

Religion codified into law. Yes, that's the origins of marriage.

This is a win for the GOP and particularly our President Bush. Let the homosexuals drive the democrats right into a corner or out on a limb. Either way, it's put-up ir shut-up time for the democrats. Civil unions won't fly until pigs fly.

[David Isaac]

"The problem is when they want their religion codified into law," she said.


Which one must presume is a heinous act compared to trying to codify one's perversion.

[Brandon]

The bishops' statement says a same-sex union contradicts the purpose of marriage because "it is not based on the natural complementarity of male and female; it cannot cooperate with God to create new life; and the natural purpose of sexual union cannot be achieved by a same-sex union."

Ladies who have passed through menopause, please take note: This guy doesn't think you should be allowed to marry.

[Jim Noble]

But Bishop J. Kevin Boland of the Diocese of Savannah insisted the document, to be distributed to Catholic churches in pamphlet form, was not intended to condemn homosexuals. "We respect their dignity as persons," Boland said at a news conference. "We know that, with some individuals, it's not their choice to be gay.

The Roman Catholic bishops of America (is there such an organization?), beginning with Always Our Children, have accepted wholeheartedly the liberationist view of "sexual orientation" as a fixed attribute which is both necessary and sufficient to describe a person.

This view, which is almost certainly wrong, is also accepted by all 3 branches of the United States government and many other sources of authority.

This view overturns millenia of common wisdom about human nature, as it must, since it is part of the great project to abolish the natural in man and to replace it with the dictates of the state.

[Dajjal]

Bumpus ad summum

[Arrowhead1952]

Catholic official likens same-sex unions to abortion

My thoughts on this are:
1. Same sex unions are not in the Bible, or part of nature.
2. There can be no natural offspring from same sex unions.
3. Abortion kills babies.
4. If there are no offspring from same sex unions, and we keep killing babies, mankind is doomed.

My solution to this is, put all gays on one island and all lesbians on another. Give them on generation, and there will be no gays or lesbians to deal with. Their culture will be gone.

[NYer]

a same-sex union contradicts the purpose of marriage because "it is not based on the natural complementarity of male and female; it cannot cooperate with God to create new life; and the natural purpose of sexual union cannot be achieved by a same-sex union

Short, succinct and straight to the point!

Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list

[Coleus]

How many of those Mass. Supreme Court justices are Catholics?

[Joe Republc]

""The problem is when they want their religion codified into law," she said. "They're mixing politics and religion in a way that we believe is wrong." "

To paraphrase from R. Zacharias, rzim.org...

radical seculization => no shame
radical plurality => no reason
radical privation => no meaning

I'll add my own

radical tolerance => callousness

[sspxsteph]

"Marriage is, in many ways, in a crisis in this country," Boland said.

A very true statement. It is sad to see all 'normal' marriages mess up, and then to have this on top of it.