Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metalboy

Clearly from the front

24 posted on 11/19/2003 5:24:49 AM PST by The Mayor (Through prayer, finite man draws upon the power of the infinite God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: The Mayor
You don't know anything about firearms and what they do.

Small entrance wound, large exit wound.
28 posted on 11/19/2003 5:35:59 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
Thanks for doing that!

Everytime I watch that film I have to believe it came from the front. I've read explanations on how a shot from the rear would have made his head go back like that but when I see it on the film I just can't buy it.



29 posted on 11/19/2003 5:36:02 AM PST by gingerky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor

Look at the driver in front of Connelly and his wife...Right before Kennedy gets hit, you see what looks like the driver turn around with a gun...You can`t see him until he turns around, and you can clearly see what looks like a silver thing pop out the side of the screen. Of course there`s no smoke, but really, what is that? I must report this to Oliver Stone.

31 posted on 11/19/2003 5:43:21 AM PST by metalboy (Room for 19 Muslim mass murderers, but no room for an innocent little Cuban boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
Clearly from the front

Sorry, I clearly disagree. I am no ballistic expert nor am I a forensic expert. Having said that, I have been a shooter since forever. So is my entire family. I have hunted and shot thousands and thousands of rounds. For me, as gruesome as it is, this shot came from behind and above Kennedy. For me, this is intractable.

59 posted on 11/19/2003 11:09:55 AM PST by Lando Lincoln (God Bless the arsenal of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
Have you ever watched just the driver's hands in that clip?
85 posted on 11/19/2003 1:59:06 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
I'd say the shooter was to the back and to Kennedy's left.
86 posted on 11/19/2003 1:59:53 PM PST by Tribune7 (It's not like he let his secretary drown in his car or something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
That would be the intuitive explanation of the head snapping back. The tissue is clearly being ejected to the front however. This tends to indicate a shot from behind. It may also explain why the head snaps back, the force of the ejection could have forced the head back. You've also got the movement of the car, damage to the neck, and the back brace Kennedy was wearing effecting the the reaction of his body.

And what's the point of lieing about where the shot came from anyway? Why wouldn't the conspirators just say Oswald shot him from the grassy knoll?
114 posted on 11/19/2003 3:12:52 PM PST by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
Agreed...Oswald hit him three times, but in the back/shoulder/neck areas. The fatal shot HAD to come from the front. The History Channel's "The Men Who Killed JFK" program showed a very plausible location from the street storm drain where any average size man could fit and escape from within 30 minutes.
177 posted on 11/20/2003 1:13:49 AM PST by Wondervixen (Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: The Mayor
Jackie almost got HER head shot off instead of JFK's it seems by the film.
224 posted on 11/21/2003 6:59:57 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson