[Az Joe]

I never said my mind was closed. I said that after reading numerous books on the subject on both sides of the issue (conspiracy, no conspiracy) and formulating an opinion over many decades I have come to a conclusion.

If new evidence comes forward or new technologies that can examine old evidence I would be happy to look at it. Right now, from what I have seen, Oswald did it alone.

You are the one who is closed about it. You insist that it was some kind of conspiracy and you are not open to the possibility that it wasn't.

[TruBluKentuckian]

"You are the one who is closed about it. You insist that it was some kind of conspiracy and you are not open to the possibility that it wasn't."

Where did I "insist" there was a conspiracy? Don't put words in my mouth. While I am open to debate on the subject, you refuse to debate it, resorting to name calling and accusing other people (those who dare to think) of being close minded.

It is YOU who is close minded. It is YOU who "insists" there WASN'T a conspiracy. Since you are trying to prove a negative, the burden of proof is on you.

[SerpentDove]

What do you make of the fact that the bullet wound in the front of the neck does not exit out the back?

And that the examining doctor said he stuck his finger into the wound and could feel where it ended?