If you want an amendment to save the sanctity of marriage he it is.
To: conservativefromGa
If you want an amendment to save the sanctity of marriage he it is.opps I meant here it is
To: conservativefromGa
from www.house.gov the committee that has it right now.
To: conservativefromGa
Im not well versed in the intricasies of the consitution of points of law but it seems to me that what we need to address are theses judicial appointments for life. I Find it appalling that these judges cannot be stopped once they are in the door. The fact that they spit on what the people want is beyond the pale.
5 posted on
11/18/2003 5:31:43 PM PST by
mylife
To: conservativefromGa
I think it needs a slight change.
`SECTION 1. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man (who was born a man) and a woman (who was born a woman). Neither this Constitution or the constitution of any State, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.'.
To: conservativefromGa
`SECTION 1. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. It may be prudent to change the wording to 'one man and one woman' as you never know if down the road the definition of "a" may be called into question.
To: conservativefromGa
What does this do to prohibit the 'Civil Union' as recognized in Vermont? I see nothing prohibiting it.
15 posted on
11/18/2003 6:11:48 PM PST by
deport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
