Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Semper911
Yes, I did mean Mass!....I had just sent a email to someone in Minn and had " Minn" on the brain!! LOL! I stand corrected.
96 posted on 11/18/2003 4:13:51 PM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
There was a divorce granted to a couple that had one of the Vermont Civil Unions by a Texas Judge in March of 03. The Texas AG Gregg Abbott asked Judge Mulvaney to set aside his ruling because Texas law does not provide for civil union dissolution and divorces cannot be granted to same sex couples. “Because these two men were never married under either Vermont or Texas law, they cannot legally petition for divorce under the Texas Family Code,” he said. “The court’s final decree of divorce is void as a matter of law.”

Mulvaney’s original decision was based primarily on the U.S. Constitution’s full faith and credit clause, which requires states to honor marriages performed in any other state, among other legal certifications.

A bit more about the Vermont Civil Union.....


118 posted on 11/18/2003 4:28:32 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson