[Question_Assumptions]

This doesn't sound all that unreasonable to me. They do give you a way to turn off the "weapons" category, do they not? What else does it include? Yes, you may not like the idea of censoring sites that talk about the responsible use of guns from children but I'm sure there are leftists out there that don't like the idea of censoring sites that talk about what they consider "responsible" attitudes towards sex, drugs, abortion, paganism, and homosexuality. Symantec can't be expected to please everyone.

[fiscally_right]

Agreed, the parents can tailor their individual software, what's the problem? Parents should be the ones to teach their kids about guns, gun ownership, and gun safety anyway.

[Still Thinking]

This doesn't sound all that unreasonable to me. They do give you a way to turn off the "weapons" category, do they not? What else does it include? Yes, you may not like the idea of censoring sites that talk about the responsible use of guns from children but I'm sure there are leftists out there that don't like the idea of censoring sites that talk about what they consider "responsible" attitudes towards sex, drugs, abortion, paganism, and homosexuality. Symantec can't be expected to please everyone.

I disagree completely. What about discrimination against those of us who still believe in the constitution?? Why aren't sites run by "living constitution" anti-righters that might offend me, blocked?