To: .cnI redruM
It funny to think that the first court decision about guns control was a gangster that could not prove that his shotgun was for military purposes. Because of that he lost the case. Now you can't have a gun for military purposes, as per the second amendment. How in the world did that happen?
3 posted on
11/18/2003 12:11:49 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: vpintheak
It funny to think that the first court decision about guns control was a gangster that could not prove that his shotgun was for military purposes. Because of that he lost the case. Now you can't have a gun for military purposes, as per the second amendment. How in the world did that happen?
_______________________________
Actually, he never even showed up to argue his case in front of the Supreme Court. The Court said that they would not take notice of the fact that a shotgun hjad a military purpose in the absence of any evidence. Had he not fled, he might have won.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson