Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
It looks like he was able to get--surprise surprise--about 1 out of 10.

Instead of 95-5, it was 90-10. And that's on roughly 25% of the electorate. If the electorate was 400 people, he gained 5 and Blanco lost 5. That closes a 2.5% gap. How is picking up 2.5% not huge? It's simple arithmetic.

Of course, you have to be within 2.5 points in the first place for it to mean victory, but why dismiss the successful part of the campaign strategy because other parts of a campaign were less successful?

103 posted on 11/20/2003 1:10:06 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Colgate Raiders Football -- 11-0 and headed to the playoffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
All he did was get the maximum allowable black votes for a GOPer: 10% (a little less actually.) Yawn.
105 posted on 11/20/2003 1:13:10 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: JohnnyZ
Jindal lost b/c the poor whites in North Louisiana and some in So. Louisiana (Tangipahoa and Washington Parishes)wouldn't vote for him. Had they supported him in the same manner they supported Suzie Terrel for senate last year, he would be the governor.

You can assign any number of reasons for this (healthcare, Dem identification, etc) but these are the same people who came out in droves for David Duke in 1991, thus my conclusion is that Jindal lost b/c of racism.

121 posted on 11/20/2003 2:36:49 PM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson