[richtig_faust]

OK, i'll try to get down to your level. You freaks claim you were "born that way" strictly based upon a 1973 poll that was taken. That makes your CURRENT opinion 2003 - 1973 = 30 years old. Hence, my data is newer, back in the closet you freak. Plus the burden of proof is on you perverts, not us -- but monozygotic studies etc. have already proven you wrong.

[newcats]

OK, i'll try to get down to your level. You freaks claim you were "born that way" strictly based upon a 1973 poll that was taken. That makes your CURRENT opinion 2003 - 1973 = 30 years old. Hence, my data is newer, back in the closet you freak. Plus the burden of proof is on you perverts, not us -- but monozygotic studies etc. have already proven you wrong.

I do honestly think you either...are completely lsing it, or it is way past your bedtime. Your posts are making less and less sense.

First of all, I am not gay. Ask my wife of 23 years or my 2 kids.

Where did the 1973 poll come from? I never said anything about a poll or study. You need to FOCUS here. Stop confusing posts or making absurd assumptions.
Do you have this thing for monozygotic studies? Is it some kinda twin fetish you have?
Freak, pervert ...Gee reminds me of a grade school playground. BTW, shouldn't you be in school right now? Playing hookey?

[atlaw]

"OK, i'll try to get down to your level. You freaks claim you were "born that way" strictly based upon a 1973 poll that was taken. That makes your CURRENT opinion 2003 - 1973 = 30 years old. Hence, my data is newer, back in the closet you freak. Plus the burden of proof is on you perverts, not us -- but monozygotic studies etc. have already proven you wrong."

Yikes. And this from the guy whose job at the gay bar didn't work out.