To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Why just couples?
13 posted on
11/18/2003 7:08:17 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
To: AppyPappy
LOL!
How about three women or four men? Two men and a woman?
How about two women and a dog? How about three men and a sheep? It could be endless!
On a series note...I would like to see the stats on drug use in gays. I had Lesbian friends who smoked pot as much as they breathed. My sister has become a big pothead since coming out as well.
28 posted on
11/18/2003 7:12:32 AM PST by
netmilsmom
(Lost my 4th E-Bay auction, Kid's sick, Dad in CA & out of coffee - Just shoot me now!)
To: AppyPappy
Why just couples?Exactly. Someone should immediately push the "courts" for two or three people, and why not animals? Surely there's nothing in the constitution that you can't marry your pet.
32 posted on
11/18/2003 7:13:06 AM PST by
stevio
To: AppyPappy
Why just couples? Bump ... darn good question, given the reasoning this court used. Now polygamists are second-class citizens. Sodom, Gomorrah, and Massachusetts.
93 posted on
11/18/2003 7:29:23 AM PST by
Cboldt
To: AppyPappy
Your right, why just couples?? Thats descrimination!!
Marriage can be 4 guys and a mule! /sarcasm (I hope)
95 posted on
11/18/2003 7:30:00 AM PST by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: AppyPappy
Why just couples? Exactly. What about polygamists, pedophiles, et.al.?
101 posted on
11/18/2003 7:31:40 AM PST by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: AppyPappy
Why just couples?Indeed. I feel discriminated against. I, my woman, a few friends down the way, and a couple of stray dogs we found want to get married. I think it is appalling that this union is restricted to TWO HUMANS.
295 posted on
11/18/2003 8:49:28 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson