[Burkeman1]

The accusations in this article basically say that intel was force fed to Bush on Iraq WMD's, nuclear programs, and Al Queda links that was not vetted through proper intel channels. Supposing this is true what should happen?

What would we, as conservatives (well at least some of us are)have done if confronted with the same facts about Clinton during his time?

[billbears]

Well you know what we would do. We would be out protesting in the streets, a protest on every street corner. Saying to everyone that would listen the evidence is flimsy, that Clinton wanted to bomb another aspirin factory.

Funny how you change a few key positions in politics but not the intelligence agency that supplies the facts and the war effort is not only acceptable, to question it makes you unpatriotic

Of course that's a conservative, not Republican, point of view

[VRWC_minion]

Even if all the intel was pure unadulterated fiction, Bush did the right thing. Therefore proving that the intel was bogus is a strawdog argument. The issue is still, should we stick Saddam back in power ?