Juan Williams and others like him are actively taking a Clintonian stance on this issue, which is very typical. How do they approach this document? They demand that it be "proven," or in other words, they are looking again at the evil world of terrorists through the legalistic prism that Clinton so often employed. Williams is again figuring that both SH and OBL are innocent until proven guilty regarding their "alleged" association. What a bunch of nonsense. No wonder the Democrats are so irrelevant . . . er . . . so Nine/Ten.
Actually, it seems Hillary initially supported the Administration. From the Rockaway, NY Wave, 3/9/2002
"Clinton noted that while she does not agree with certain actions used by the Bush administration in the war effort, she does agree with the administration that Saddam Hussein must be deposed from Iraq.
"The Senator stated, 'There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein is extremely dangerous. Based on reports that I have seen, with regard to him building and acquiring weapons of mass destruction, I am absolutely convinced that we should use methods to oust him. How we do it is the question.'"
http://www.rockawave.com/news/2002/0309/Front_Page/C-Senator_Clinton0309.html I wonder what her position is now?