To: South40
I have great hopes for Arnolds governance, however, I am a bit dismayed by a inagural luncheon for so many people. Who is paying for this extravagance when the state is broke?
7 posted on
11/17/2003 12:42:49 PM PST by
LaraCroft
(Grrr baby, very grrrr)
To: LaraCroft; Lazamataz
...I am a bit dismayed by a inagural luncheon for so many people. Who is paying for this extravagance when the state is broke? Not to worry.
Laz had a good week last week, said lunch is on him.
Dan
(c;
9 posted on
11/17/2003 12:45:24 PM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: LaraCroft
I have great hopes for Arnolds governance, however, I am a bit dismayed by a inagural luncheon for so many people. Who is paying for this extravagance when the state is broke? I have no idea. I do know the usual Inaugural Ball with all its extravagance will not take place.
Davis’ mismanagement was/is costing Californians 30-35 million a day. If the cost of a luncheon is the price to pay for booting his sorry butt it's money well spent.
10 posted on
11/17/2003 12:48:14 PM PST by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: LaraCroft
How silly to worry about who paid for the lunch. There's ALWAYS some sort of inaugural festivity. Usually it's MUCH more extravagant, so this lunch was by all rights much more sensible.
Or are you just looking for something to slap Arnold with?
13 posted on
11/17/2003 1:03:42 PM PST by
EggsAckley
(..................."Dean's got Tom McClintock Eyes".........................)
To: LaraCroft
Who is paying for this extravagance when the state is broke? Probably Ahnold himself.
24 posted on
11/17/2003 2:33:19 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson