To: MineralMan
I don't suppose you'd care to summarize this "simple explanation"? I don't see how she could be biologically unrelated to her biological sister's biological children.
54 posted on
11/17/2003 11:02:59 AM PST by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: Sloth
"I don't suppose you'd care to summarize this "simple explanation"? I don't see how she could be biologically unrelated to her biological sister's biological children."
I would -hope- a paternity (maternity?) test is able to differentiate a child-mother relationship from a child-aunt relationship. It's not like no one ever cheated with a spouse's sibling.
Qwinn
59 posted on
11/17/2003 11:06:01 AM PST by
Qwinn
To: Sloth
"I don't suppose you'd care to summarize this "simple explanation"? I don't see how she could be biologically unrelated to her biological sister's biological children. "
Of course she's related. It's just that she didn't appear to be the mother.
68 posted on
11/17/2003 11:29:05 AM PST by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson