Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad Fairbanks
You and I have no doubt that Sadaam needed to go, to preserve the lives of innocent Americans. Many senior Democrats however, have bet the farm (politically) on convincing enough of the public that this is not the case.

They are pouring their resources into making folks think that:

a. Saddam had no WMDs

b. He was not supporting al Queda.

If it can be shown that they knew that this threat was real against Americans, and they knowingly lied about it for political gain (aiding and abbetting the enemy in the process) then they will be well and truly screwed come election time.

The fact that they were being partisan will mostly inflame partisans of the other party, its just a minor irritation to the middle-of-the-road folks, who generalize that "all politicians are that way". What will really reasonate is who was actually lying to the public (playing us for fools). It will be worse for Democrats if they are caught, because it will have been life-threatening treason, as opposed to just butt-covering or manipulation.

336 posted on 11/22/2003 10:24:22 AM PST by ABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]


To: ABN
Which is why it is so very important to get MemoGate out into the public. It won't be easy, as the media will cover for the rats every chance they get. Only with enough outrage among those in power in DC, will the media no longer be able to ignore it...

And to get that outrage, we have to find ways to get the populace outraged.
337 posted on 11/22/2003 10:27:58 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (All I want is a warm bed, a kind word and unlimited power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson