[Tribune7]

At 652 you claim our rights "go away" if we change this belief. Has this happened? - When? Where?

Since God exists and our rights are inalienable they can never go away.

The concern expressed in 652 was that those who acquire power will be unrestrained in violating those rights without the expressed, public understanding they are sacred.

You do recognize that rights can be violated?

[tpaine]

Tribune7:
Our rights our inherent to an axiomatic belief they come from a Creator.

I am as certain as I am of God's existence that if you change this axiom our rights go away.

652 -t7-


______________________________________



At 652 you claim our rights "go away" if we change this belief. Has this happened? - When? Where?

---

Since God exists and our rights are inalienable they can never go away.
The concern expressed in 652 was that those who acquire power will be unrestrained in violating those rights without the expressed, public understanding they are sacred.

---

Then you weren't "certain as I am of God's existence" at all, were you?

-- You have now changed to a 'concern' you expressed in 652, because your reasoning was obviously invalid.

Thanks for playing, -- neat game when you can change 'certainties' to concerns whenever you wish.