[tpaine]

Tribune7
If an atheist concludes that he can never figure out the purpose of of his existence, he is shallow.
If an atheist concludes that his existence has a purpose, he is basing it on a "faith" in things that he can't measure.
This, of course, means that any declaration that, that which can't be measure is ignorable, is irrational.
623 -T7-

---

Trib, -- you've made a declaration that the following line is irrational:
"that which can't be measure is ignorable"

Your declaration does not prove that if an atheist concludes that his existence has a purpose, he is basing it on a "faith" in things that he can't measure.

Your remark is merely your irrational opinion.
631 posted by tpaine

---

No. My declaration was that that (some) atheist believes that what can't be measured is ignorable.
My belief is that what can't be meausred is the most important.
634 -t7-

---

No, your declaration is as it reads above, in your own initial irrational words, at #623. -- Your reply at 634 just makes more obvious your own mental confusion.

You can only fool some people some of the time, kiddo. This is not the time.

[Tribune7]

If an atheist concludes that his existence has a purpose, he is basing it on a "faith" in things that he can't measure. This, of course, means that any declaration that, that which can't be measure is ignorable, is irrational.

-- Tribune 7.

And you disagree with this because . . .?