Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Jews Unite To Fight Shechita Ban
jewishpress ^ | 11-17-03 | Andrew Morris

Posted on 11/16/2003 3:56:14 PM PST by SJackson

(JTA) LONDON – A campaign to repeal laws that guarantee the right to practice kosher slaughter has prompted a rare show of unity among Britain’s Jews.

Currently all animals slaughtered for food in Britain must be stunned before their throats are cut, except for those killed by kosher and halal methods, the latter for the Muslim form of ritual slaughter.

Both religions forbid stunning, which they believe causes unacceptable suffering to the animal. And both have been the targets of a campaign by groups that say religious slaughter is inhumane.

The leaders of the newly formed Shechita UK, which brings together representatives of the groups fighting to keep shechita and the kosher meat it produces legal, say they intend not just to defend the practice against the stunning recommendations but to prove that the kosher method of slaughter is as humane, if not more so, than the methods practiced in non-religious slaughterhouses.

“Together we will not just protect shechita, but promote it,” said Henry Grunwald, president of the Jewish Board of Deputies and honorary chairman of the new group.

It is a battle that Shechita UK will have to fight vigorously. In Europe, religious slaughter is often seen as cruel and unnecessary by the wider public as well as by many animal-rights groups.

“There has been a groundswell of interest by the public in animal-rights issues, but little is known or understood about the Jewish method of slaughter and the perception of shechita needs to change,” said Chanoch Kesselman, vice president of the Campaign for the Protection Shechita.

Kesselman’s group, along with the Board of Deputies and the National Council of Shechita Boards, is part of the new umbrella group.

When shechita was last seriously threatened in 1985, the government had to deal with a number of different Jewish organizations – an approach that Shechita UK says weakened the community’s effectiveness.

“We now speak with one voice, one educated voice,” Kesselman said.

Organizers hope that a London-based public relations firm will help them persuade animal-rights groups, lawmakers and the public that shechita is a humane method of slaughter.

The team is led by Shimon Cohen, who is aware from his involvement in previous attempts to outlaw religious slaughter in the United Kingdom that simply defending the right to practice shechita will not guarantee its place in law.

“The days of merely reacting to the threat to shechita is over,” Cohen said.

“What we are going to put out is a positive message, not just a defensive one.”

Cohen said he wants Shechita UK to argue that there is no contradiction between the animals’ welfare and kosher slaughter.

British legislation on slaughterhouses enshrines the principle that “it is an absolute offense to cause or permit an animal avoidable excitement, pain or suffering.”

Both sides are adamant that humane treatment of animals is sacrosanct to their method of slaughter.

Shechita UK points to the fact that a number of scientific studies, most of them American, have concluded that stunning, which is meant to make the animal unconscious before cutting the throat, can sometimes cause great distress. The studies also say that shechita, in draining the blood quickly by a precision cut, minimizes pain, since consciousness is lost rapidly.

Convincing the Farm Animal Welfare Council, the government-sponsored advisory body that wants to outlaw religious slaughter, will be no easy task. Judy MacArthur Clark, chairwoman of FAWC, stated that her organization’s support for stunning is solid.

“There is absolutely no evidence to prove that shechita is a more humane method of killing an animal than the pre-stunning,” said MacArthur Clark, who rejected the validity of the U.S. studies favorable to religious slaughter.

“How can you consider that cutting all the major tissues in an animal’s throat will not cause great pain to an animal?” she asked.

So far, the government has not responded officially to FAWC’s recommendations – which, although they carry significant scientific and political weight, do not have the power of law.

Nonetheless, MacArthur Clark said she is confident that the authorities would take FAWC’s opposition to religious slaughter very seriously.

Another adversary of shechita is Vegetarians International Voice for Animals, a lobbying group that supports FAWC’s stance and recently launched its own campaign against religious slaughter.

The group’s associate director, Tony Wardle, described shechita as “barbaric.”

“It is appalling that in this day and age a group can defend a medieval practice that has been shown overwhelmingly by scientific study to be inhumane,” Wardle said.

Although the animal welfare activist said he would be interested in seeing kosher slaughter in person – an initiative Shechita UK hopes to promote among Jewish and non-Jewish media and activists alike – Wardle said he had seen a video of shechita that made him “want to vomit.”

The British Veterinary Association has also welcomed the FAWC recommendations.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britishjews; uk

1 posted on 11/16/2003 3:56:14 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
2 posted on 11/16/2003 3:59:33 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The easiest way to have a pure kosher diet is to be a vegetarian, and the whole dilemma is solved.
3 posted on 11/16/2003 4:27:03 PM PST by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Both religions forbid stunning, which they believe causes unacceptable suffering to the animal.

I thought this was wrong, so checked with the official JAKIM web site (Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia). Halal slaughter permits stunning, provided the method used does not penetrate the brain of the animal.

As to the scientific issue, the consensus of research (and my own direct observation) is that halal slaughter does not inflict unnecessary suffering. Hence - since the methods are almost identical - neither will shechita slaughter. Go here for more.

4 posted on 11/16/2003 5:17:42 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
As it has always been, the true motive here is to deny observant Jews meat in their diet.
5 posted on 11/16/2003 5:23:50 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Not-so-Strange coincidence that a leftist issue also happens to be antisemitic once again. You can imagine how as in Sweden, kosher slaughter is going to be characterized as "barbaric sacrifice" - it sure wasn't the jews having a madcow epidemic.

Didn't the nazis start out by banning kosher slaughter?

6 posted on 11/16/2003 5:42:29 PM PST by jonatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Didn't the nazis start out by banning kosher slaughter?

I believe the first law banned Jews swimming with Christians.

Someone will correct me if this is wrong.

7 posted on 11/16/2003 5:59:53 PM PST by tubavil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tubavil
Considering that the Tories just selected the son of Romanian Jewish refugees as party leader, I don't think that the problem is with the right.
8 posted on 11/16/2003 6:27:46 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jonatron
Actually, Norway lead the charge on this issue in the 30's, passing a law banning Kosher slaughter in 1931. Nazi Germany followed in 1933.

The current campaign seems to have begun on the continent three to four years ago, and is now making headway in the UK. Only a matter of time before it arrives on our shores, I reckon.
9 posted on 11/16/2003 6:30:47 PM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
And the cycle begins anew.
10 posted on 11/16/2003 9:00:26 PM PST by Imal (It is better to go to war than to have it come to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What would PETA prefer? Lethal injection? Old age?

11 posted on 11/16/2003 9:03:01 PM PST by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
Kosher slaughter has been banned in Switzerland since before WW2. The law is so severe they do not even allow the importation of kosher meat that has been slaughtered elsewhere.

The good news is, the world's best kosher chocolate is made in Switzerland.

12 posted on 11/16/2003 9:04:41 PM PST by Alouette (My son, the Learned Elder of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson