Posted on 11/16/2003 3:56:14 PM PST by SJackson
(JTA) LONDON A campaign to repeal laws that guarantee the right to practice kosher slaughter has prompted a rare show of unity among Britains Jews.
Currently all animals slaughtered for food in Britain must be stunned before their throats are cut, except for those killed by kosher and halal methods, the latter for the Muslim form of ritual slaughter.
Both religions forbid stunning, which they believe causes unacceptable suffering to the animal. And both have been the targets of a campaign by groups that say religious slaughter is inhumane.
The leaders of the newly formed Shechita UK, which brings together representatives of the groups fighting to keep shechita and the kosher meat it produces legal, say they intend not just to defend the practice against the stunning recommendations but to prove that the kosher method of slaughter is as humane, if not more so, than the methods practiced in non-religious slaughterhouses.
Together we will not just protect shechita, but promote it, said Henry Grunwald, president of the Jewish Board of Deputies and honorary chairman of the new group.
It is a battle that Shechita UK will have to fight vigorously. In Europe, religious slaughter is often seen as cruel and unnecessary by the wider public as well as by many animal-rights groups.
There has been a groundswell of interest by the public in animal-rights issues, but little is known or understood about the Jewish method of slaughter and the perception of shechita needs to change, said Chanoch Kesselman, vice president of the Campaign for the Protection Shechita.
Kesselmans group, along with the Board of Deputies and the National Council of Shechita Boards, is part of the new umbrella group.
When shechita was last seriously threatened in 1985, the government had to deal with a number of different Jewish organizations an approach that Shechita UK says weakened the communitys effectiveness.
We now speak with one voice, one educated voice, Kesselman said.
Organizers hope that a London-based public relations firm will help them persuade animal-rights groups, lawmakers and the public that shechita is a humane method of slaughter.
The team is led by Shimon Cohen, who is aware from his involvement in previous attempts to outlaw religious slaughter in the United Kingdom that simply defending the right to practice shechita will not guarantee its place in law.
The days of merely reacting to the threat to shechita is over, Cohen said.
What we are going to put out is a positive message, not just a defensive one.
Cohen said he wants Shechita UK to argue that there is no contradiction between the animals welfare and kosher slaughter.
British legislation on slaughterhouses enshrines the principle that it is an absolute offense to cause or permit an animal avoidable excitement, pain or suffering.
Both sides are adamant that humane treatment of animals is sacrosanct to their method of slaughter.
Shechita UK points to the fact that a number of scientific studies, most of them American, have concluded that stunning, which is meant to make the animal unconscious before cutting the throat, can sometimes cause great distress. The studies also say that shechita, in draining the blood quickly by a precision cut, minimizes pain, since consciousness is lost rapidly.
Convincing the Farm Animal Welfare Council, the government-sponsored advisory body that wants to outlaw religious slaughter, will be no easy task. Judy MacArthur Clark, chairwoman of FAWC, stated that her organizations support for stunning is solid.
There is absolutely no evidence to prove that shechita is a more humane method of killing an animal than the pre-stunning, said MacArthur Clark, who rejected the validity of the U.S. studies favorable to religious slaughter.
How can you consider that cutting all the major tissues in an animals throat will not cause great pain to an animal? she asked.
So far, the government has not responded officially to FAWCs recommendations which, although they carry significant scientific and political weight, do not have the power of law.
Nonetheless, MacArthur Clark said she is confident that the authorities would take FAWCs opposition to religious slaughter very seriously.
Another adversary of shechita is Vegetarians International Voice for Animals, a lobbying group that supports FAWCs stance and recently launched its own campaign against religious slaughter.
The groups associate director, Tony Wardle, described shechita as barbaric.
It is appalling that in this day and age a group can defend a medieval practice that has been shown overwhelmingly by scientific study to be inhumane, Wardle said.
Although the animal welfare activist said he would be interested in seeing kosher slaughter in person an initiative Shechita UK hopes to promote among Jewish and non-Jewish media and activists alike Wardle said he had seen a video of shechita that made him want to vomit.
The British Veterinary Association has also welcomed the FAWC recommendations.
I thought this was wrong, so checked with the official JAKIM web site (Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia). Halal slaughter permits stunning, provided the method used does not penetrate the brain of the animal.
As to the scientific issue, the consensus of research (and my own direct observation) is that halal slaughter does not inflict unnecessary suffering. Hence - since the methods are almost identical - neither will shechita slaughter. Go here for more.
Didn't the nazis start out by banning kosher slaughter?
I believe the first law banned Jews swimming with Christians.
Someone will correct me if this is wrong.
What would PETA prefer? Lethal injection? Old age?
The good news is, the world's best kosher chocolate is made in Switzerland.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.