Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ventures in Russia may not be secure
Dallas Morning News ^ | 11.14.03 | Jim Landers

Posted on 11/14/2003 7:51:59 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford

Ventures in Russia may not be secure: Putin's moves to curb oil tycoon threaten U.S. investments

By JIM LANDERS

WASHINGTON – The struggle between President Vladimir Putin and jailed oilman Mikhail Khodorkovsky is a nasty political brawl with major consequences for the future of democracy in Russia.

But it is already consequential to the energy futures of China and the United States.

Yukos Oil Co., Mr. Khodorkovsky's company, delivered the first cargo of Russian oil to Houston on July 3, 2002. A year later, Russia ranked sixth among the countries selling oil to the United States, providing 550,000 barrels a day.

Mr. Khodorkovsky then cut a deal with four other Russian companies to build an export pipeline and terminal near Murmansk. The project aimed to raise Russian oil exports to the United States to 2 million barrels a day – an amount that would put Russia on par with Canada, Mexico and Saudi Arabia.

Yukos has also signed agreements with China to build a pipeline from Eastern Siberia to Manchuria that would ship more than 500,000 barrels of oil a day.

But Mr. Putin's government controls Russian oil exports through state ownership of export pipelines and terminals. The idea that Yukos would cut its own deals rankled Russian energy bureaucrats, who objected to both proposals.

Transneft, the Russian national pipeline company, iced the deal with China in January in favor of another line to the Pacific targeting Japan, which angered the Chinese. The Murmansk proposal lives on, winning favorable notice in U.S.-Russian presidential summits. But it remains to be seen who will build it and who will pay for it.

A Transneft vice president said last week that a Murmansk pipeline feasibility study will be done in the fall of 2004 but that the pipeline's capacity will have to be trimmed to accommodate another Transneft pipeline to the Baltic.

When Mr. Khodorkovsky was arrested, Yukos was completing a merger with Sibneft, another Russian oil firm, that would make YukosSibneft the largest Russian oil company and one of the largest oil producers in the world.

Houston-based ChevronTexaco Corp. was widely reported to be in discussions with the company for a stake as large as 40 percent.

Irving-based Exxon Mobil Corp. was also reported to be talking about buying a piece of Yukos, though Mr. Khodorkovsky said that dialog was between Exxon Mobil and Mr. Putin.

ChevronTexaco and Exxon Mobil have declined to comment.

Russian and U.S. analysts say Mr. Khodorkovsky was asserting himself in the Russian president's domain.

"Khodorkovsky began to initiate interesting projects: the Murmansk oil pipeline, then Daqing [Manchuria], energy dialogue with the United States, and so on," said Lilliya Shevtsova of the Moscow Carnegie Center. "He began doing what in Russia can be done only by the president."

Harley Balzer, a government professor at Georgetown University, views Mr. Khodorkovsky's arrest as an unfortunate attempt by Mr. Putin's government to regain control of Russian oil and natural gas.

"We don't need more OPEC-like entities," he said. "Our interest is Russia producing the maximum volume of oil and gas at the lowest possible price, and doing it in ways that maximize the total yield from their fields."

This summer, Mr. Putin asserted that Russia has a right to protect its national interests from any interference with the oil and natural gas pipelines crossing the borders of the former Soviet Union.

In September, he met with President Bush at Camp David, Md., and suggested that Russia's "very high level energy dialogue with the United States, including at the very top level," had saved American motorists from a gasoline price shock during the Iraq war.

From his jail cell, Mr. Khodorkovsky has severed his ties with Yukos. That should have been the end of the affair as far as U.S. business interests are concerned. But Mr. Putin's government froze 44 percent of the shares of Yukos and has threatened to revoke its licenses for several oil fields.

"That's a very big deal," said Blake Marshall, executive vice president of the U.S.-Russia Business Council. "It's safe to say that will give investors pause."

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., says the Yukos affair reflects Mr. Putin's interest in "neo-imperialism abroad, and authoritarian control at home.

"The American business community should consider itself warned: Your investments are not safe," Mr. McCain said.

E-mail jlanders@dallasnews.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/14/2003 7:52:00 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., says the Yukos affair reflects Mr. Putin's interest in "neo-imperialism abroad, and authoritarian control at home.

Kinda like looking in a mirror eh John.........

2 posted on 11/14/2003 7:58:57 AM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Russia has a right to set limits on key commodities, although one may question the prudence in doing so. Nevertheless what's at stake here is the rule of law. Business and commerce can't really thrive unless they can count on some minimal standards of justice and the rule of law. Contracts must be enforced and agreements must be kept.

Evidently Putin still wants to hang onto the kind of centralized power that his predecessors enjoyed under the Communist system. That's not compatible with the development of a free market system, which Russia needs if they are ever to put the disastrous mistakes and missed opportunities of the Soviet system behind them.

China also needs to confront these contradictions. You can't have a totalitarian government and a market economy at the same time. Sooner or later they will come into conflict. Anyone who invests in China at the present time is incredibly stupid, because they will never get their money back out.
3 posted on 11/14/2003 7:59:09 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
No surprise here other than it took so long. When are Americans going to wake up and realize that overseas companies and governments do not "play by our rules"? I have zero invsetments in overseas corporations and minimal in US companies that have moved most of their operations overseas. Japan has been breaking international laws for 60 years, Old Europe and the Arab states aren't to be trusted and as far as Russia goes - well we all know that you can't trust them. When the bottom drops out in theses second rate counties the first thing they wioll do is absorb/confiscate/nationalize the US holdings.
4 posted on 11/14/2003 8:25:29 AM PST by Semper Vigilantis (Get out and Vote! (while you still can))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson