Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
SFChronicle.com ^ | November 14, 2003 | Henry Lee

Posted on 11/14/2003 5:32:37 AM PST by runningbear

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
Amber Frey not expected to testify at Modesto hearing

Peterson seen driving to marina 3 times
Amber Frey not expected to testify at Modesto hearing

Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, November 14, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modesto -- Scott Peterson drove rental cars to the Berkeley Marina three times in the days after his pregnant wife disappeared, gazing at the water before returning home to Modesto, a detective testified Thursday.

Peterson spent only a couple of minutes each time at the marina, where he had told police he went fishing the day his wife, Laci Peterson, disappeared on Christmas Eve, Modesto police Detective Al Brocchini said. Officers who tailed the double-murder suspect saw him driving erratically at one point, as if trying to elude them, the detective said.

Peterson, 31, a former fertilizer salesman, has pleaded not guilty in the slayings of his wife and their unborn son, whose bodies washed ashore in April in Richmond, a few miles north of the marina.

Laci Peterson's body was clad in tan maternity pants and a 12- to 18-inch- long piece of duct tape was "attached to the groin area," Detective Philip Owen testified Thursday.

Also on Thursday, attorney Gloria Allred said her client Amber Frey, a Fresno massage therapist who was romantically involved with Peterson, will not testify at the preliminary hearing to determine whether Peterson is tried.

"I think that if she had been called to testify at this preliminary hearing, that the defense might have chosen to re-victimize her," Allred said.

Peterson visited the marina on Jan. 5, 6 and 9, Brocchini testified Thursday, and "stared out toward the bay" each time. While driving back to Modesto on Jan. 6, Peterson "began doing countersurveillance," making U-turns and stopping on the side of the road, Brocchini said.

But during cross-examination, defense attorney Mark Geragos asked the detective if he was aware that a Modesto newspaper had reported that divers were searching for Laci Peterson in San Francisco Bay on the same days Peterson visited the marina.

Geragos also noted that Peterson's truck had been impounded by police and suggested that his client had been driving in a way to shake off reporters. "You'd rather just come to the conclusion that it's suspicious because he's returning to the scene," Geragos said.

Brocchini also testified that Frey was introduced to Peterson after a friend of Frey's met the defendant at an agricultural conference in Anaheim. After the friend discovered that Peterson was married, she confronted him on Dec. 6. Sounding tearful, he said, "Look, I'm not married. I lost my wife. Let me break it to Amber," according to Brocchini. ..........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detective: Peterson visited bay several times before body found

Detective: Peterson visited bay several times before body found

By Harriet Ryan
Court TV
Thursday, November 13, 2003 Posted: 9:44 PM EST (0244 GMT)


Scott Peterson

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, California (Court TV) -- Two weeks after his pregnant wife went missing, Scott Peterson made three suspicious trips to the bay where her body was ultimately found, a detective testified Thursday morning.

Modesto Police Detective Al Brocchini, the lead investigator in the disappearance of Laci Peterson, said surveillance teams tailed Peterson to the San Francisco Bay January 5, 6 and 9.

On each occasion, Peterson parked at the Berkeley Marina and "stared into the bay" for a few minutes before driving away, the detective told Superior Court Judge Al Girolami.

Peterson never took his own SUV on the trips and on two occasions rented vehicles immediately before setting out for the hour and a half-long drive, the detective testified. He also said that, when Peterson discovered police were following him as he returned from the Bay January 6, he began "driving erratically" in an effort to lose them.

Peterson is accused of killing his wife in their home and then dumping her body in the bay December 24. Her remains and those of the couple's unborn son washed up on the bay shore in April. Peterson insists he was on a fishing trip in the bay when his wife vanished and had nothing to do with her murder.

The description of Peterson's brief and strange bay visits was not the only damaging testimony the detective offered Thursday, his third day on the witness stand at Peterson's preliminary hearing.

The detective also related the account of Shawn Sibley, a business associate of Peterson and the matchmaker for his extramarital relationship with masseuse Amber Frey. Sibley told the detective that, when she met Peterson at an agribusiness conference in October, he told her he was single and begged her to set him up with one of her friends.

Sibley told Brocchini she agreed "as long as Scott was serious."

"Serious about what?" prosecutor Rick Distaso asked.

"A relationship," Brocchini replied.

On December 6, a few weeks after Frey and Peterson began the affair, Sibley learned from a colleague that Peterson was married and confronted him, the detective testified.

According to Sibley's account, he told her he was a widow.

Defense attorney Geragos, left, cross-examines a witness Thursday.

"He said, 'Look, I'm not married. I lost my wife. Let me break it to Amber,'" Brocchini said. Sibley recalled Peterson sounding "extremely upset like he was crying," the detective said.

He later called back and said he had told Frey the truth: that he was a widow, the detective said.

Brocchini also cast doubt on the efforts of Peterson and his family to search for his wife. His parents and siblings established a separate tip line after becoming frustrated with the direction of the police investigation. Peterson, however, promised to turn over tips from the line to investigators. .......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson mistress won't testify at hearing


Amber Frey, right, who acknowledged an affair with Scott Peterson, will not testify at his hearing. By Jerome T. Nakagawa, AP

Posted 11/13/2003 6:33 PM Updated 11/13/2003 11:57 PM

Peterson mistress won't testify at hearing

By John Ritter, USA TODAY

MODESTO, Calif. — Scott Peterson's former mistress won't testify at a hearing to decide whether he will stand trial for the murder of his wife and unborn son.

Massage therapist Amber Frey, who taped her phone conversations with Peterson for police after he became a suspect, had been the most eagerly awaited witness after eight days of testimony. She was on the prosecutors' witness list, but her lawyer, Gloria Allred, said late Thursday that prosecutors told her Frey won't be called.

Prosecutors apparently want to spare her from early cross-examination by Peterson's lawyers. She is certain to testify if Peterson goes to trial next year as expected.

Allred's bombshell came on a day when defense lawyers accused police of a single-minded focus on nailing the former fertilizer salesman for the murders, ignoring other possible explanations for Laci Peterson's Christmas Eve disappearance.

Defense lawyer Kirk McAllister contended that detective Al Brocchini tried to get Peterson fired from his job and told friends he was going "to take Scott Peterson down." Brocchini denied that, insisting that every tip was pursued. "My intent was to catch, not get, whoever got Laci," he said.

When prosecutors detailed how Peterson returned three times to the spot where they say he dumped his wife's body, the defense countered that there were innocent explanations.

Brocchini said police tailed Peterson when he drove from his home here to San Francisco Bay three times in January. Once there, he got out of his car, stared briefly at the water, then left.

Prosecutors believe Peterson killed his pregnant wife and dumped her body in the bay. They'll try to prove that his purchase of a fishing boat two weeks before she vanished is evidence he planned the crime in advance. They're seeking the death penalty.

Prosecutor Rick Distaso sought to show that Peterson returned to where they allege he dumped her body, 85 miles from his home, on Jan. 5, 6 and 9.

But defense lawyer Mark Geragos said that.........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amber Frey Won't Take Stand At Preliminary Hearing

Amber Frey Won't Take Stand At Preliminary Hearing


Amber Frey

(ABCNEWS.com

) Nov. 13 (AP) — A lawyer for Scott Peterson's former mistress says she will not take the stand during his preliminary hearing.

Attorney Gloria Allred says that prosecutors have decided not to call Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey to testify in the hearing that will determine if Peterson stands trial in the killings of his wife and unborn son.

Allred says prosecutors determined they have presented enough evidence without Frey.

A detective testified that Frey called police about a week after Laci Peterson vanished to say she had been romantically ........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amber Frey will not take stand in preliminary hearing

Posted on Thu, Nov. 13, 2003

Amber Frey will not take stand in preliminary hearing MODESTO POLICE WERE SUSPICIOUS OF PETERSON FROM THE BEGINNING

By Julia Prodis Sulek
Mercury News

MODESTO - Three times within days of Laci Peterson's disappearance, Scott Peterson drove a rented car 90 miles to the Berkeley Marina -- the place police believe Peterson dumped his pregnant wife's body after killing her -- looked out across the water for a couple of minutes, then drove home without speaking to a soul, a detective testified Thursday.

The testimony from Modesto police Det. Al Brocchini implied that Peterson, not realizing he was being tailed by police, returned to the bay in early January to see if Laci's body had surfaced. But Peterson's defense lawyer said the trips to the marina were innocent -- he was simply a concerned husband checking up on the search effort by divers there. And although he was driving his wife's Land Rover around Modesto, he rented a car because his own truck had been impounded by police.

In other developments Thursday:

• Prosecutors decided they would not call Peterson's mistress, Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey, to the stand during the preliminary hearing, held to determine whether sufficient evidence exists to make Peterson stand trial for the deaths of his wife and unborn son. She could still testify at trial, however.

• Brocchini described how Peterson, a 31-year-old fertilizer salesman, was a married man on the prowl, asking a woman he met at a convention to set him up with one of her friends. That's how he got Frey's phone number and began the affair.

• The detective testified that Peterson had obtained a fishing license dated Dec. 23 and 24, casting doubt on the suspect's statements that he had planned to play golf the day his wife disappeared -- Dec. 24 -- and only changed his mind that morning to go fishing instead.

• Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants -- pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her husband said she was wearing when he left the house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also were wrapped with duct tape around the groin area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and close friends out of the courtroom near tears.

Police believe Peterson killed his wife sometime late Dec. 23 or early Dec. 24, put her body in his fishing boat, towed it to the Berkeley Marina, and dumped it in the bay early Christmas Eve morning. The bodies washed up separately months later about a mile north of the marina..........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family: Peterson Had Several Affairs

Thursday, November 13, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. — Scott Peterson (search) has admitted to family members and friends that he cheated on his wife, Laci Peterson (search), at least four times with different women, Fox News has learned.

One relative, who does not believe Peterson is guilty of murder, described him as a sex addict.

"He has a sexual problem and has a need to sleep with other women," the relative told Fox News.

Scott Peterson's family has contended that his wife was aware of the affairs, and that although she would get angry she'd eventually put them behind her. Peterson's mother has told relatives and friends that she knew her daughter-in-law was aware of at least one affair, and that she once saw the couple arguing over it.

Amber Frey (search), a 28-year-old single mother and massage therapist, came forward as Peterson's lover shortly after his arrest in April for the murders of Laci and their unborn child. She has maintained that she did not know that Peterson was married, and that she knew nothing about the murders.

Peterson has told his family that his relationship with Frey, who is expected to testify in his preliminary hearing, was "strictly a physical relationship."

Laci Peterson's family has said they don't believe she knew about her husband’s indiscretions, Frey included.

Fox News has also learned that Scott Peterson's parents have sold old cars and refinanced their house to help pay the $1 million cost of their son's defense by high-profile attorney Mark Geragos (search).

Testimony continued Tuesday in the preliminary hearing to determine if Peterson, a former fertilizer salesman, will stand trial on two counts of murder.

Peterson has read almost 10,000 pages of the discovery material in the case while he sits behind bars.

He also spends his days doing yoga and making items out of toothpaste and toilet paper in his cell, where he has placed four or five photos of Laci, including one of the young woman sitting in a toy car during her pregnancy, sources told Fox News.

A police officer said Tuesday that he saw a bucket and mops in plain sight in front of the Peterson home as officers began investigating his pregnant wife's disappearance. ......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LACI HUBBY'S MYSTERY MARINA TRIPS

LACI HUBBY'S MYSTERY MARINA TRIPS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 14, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Double murder suspect Scott Peterson made several suspicious trips to the waterfront where cops believe he dumped the body of his murdered wife, a detective testified yesterday. Modesto Detective Al Brocchini said investigators in January watched Peterson drive at least three times from Modesto to the Berkeley marina where he claims he set out on a solo fishing trip Christmas Eve, the night his pregnant wife, Laci, vanished.

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos admitted Peterson took the trips, but only to see police dive teams looking for Laci's body.

Meanwhile, Peterson's former mistress Amber Frey won't be called to testify at his .......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson Prelim Turns Nasty; Frey Will Not Testify

Peterson Prelim Turns Nasty; Frey Will Not Testify

POSTED: 10:17 AM PST November 13, 2003
UPDATED: 9:35 PM PST November 13, 2003

MODESTO, Calif. -- Scott Peterson's former mistress Amber Frey, rumored to be the centerpiece of the double murder case against the Modesto fertilizer salesman, will not testify at the preliminary hearing.

Frey's lawyer, Gloria Allred, said prosecutors "obviously made a determination" they have presented enough evidence to convince a judge to order Peterson to stand trial for the murder of his wife, Laci, and his unborn son.

Meanwhile, Modesto Police Det. Al Brocchini testified that police received a tip that a man who looked like Scott Peterson was seen driving toward San Francisco Bay before dawn Dec. 24 hauling a boat containing a blanket-swaddled bundle.

Brocchini said he got the tip Jan. 9 and anonymously relayed it in February to a hot line established by Scott Peterson and his family to see if they would pass the clue on to police.

"We weren't sure if he was culling out tips that were on him or on Laci sightings that we didn't know about," Brocchini said. "I was worried a good tip would come in and wouldn't get followed up on."

He said the Petersons never passed the message on to police, who had already investigated the tip. Brocchini said he interviewed the witness, but revealed nothing else about the man.

The testimony came on the eighth day of Peterson's preliminary hearing as prosecutors attempt to show there is enough evidence to have the 31-year-old fertilizer salesman tried on murder charges in the slayings of his wife and unborn son.<.......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Superior Court, Stanislaus County November 13, 2003

Minute Order: Preliminary Hearing

(ie; Ninth day court provided overview)

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last
To: Sandylapper
I'd be slugging through all that evidence and finding something pretty good I had to offer besides the hair.

Aren't you the least bit interested in why Geragos didn't badger Brocchini about the results of the gunshot residue test?

341 posted on 11/16/2003 7:26:07 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Jo Ellen Demetirus joined the defense in late October:

http://community-2.webtv.net/westttrial/doc/page8.html

Gloria is wearing the tan coat, she's on the left as you look at the photos. Laura Ingle is in all dark clothes, has longer blonde hair than Gloria and is also taller:

http://community-2.webtv.net/westri/laci5/page4.html
342 posted on 11/16/2003 7:26:28 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: hergus
I'm sure she will be advising them to get as many young female airheads as possible.
343 posted on 11/16/2003 7:29:06 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Here's the picture of the bouy again, per Gloria Gomez on CLL CTV:

http://community-2.webtv.net/melora_/SearchAreas/page10.html
344 posted on 11/16/2003 7:34:31 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: hergus
Thanks hergus. Now with that, I'm going to watch a movie. We will see what tomorrow has for us. Good night all!
345 posted on 11/16/2003 7:37:44 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
"BEWARE OF COPYCAT WEBSITES TRYING TO EXPLOIT LACI!!"

Oh no, that sucks, I hope everyone knows I don't profit in any way from my Laci website nor did I profit off of the Westerfield Trial website.

It makes me very sad that the Rochas have to be bothered by something like this on top of everything else the have to deal with now.
346 posted on 11/16/2003 7:44:08 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
I wanted a source for your comment that one of the Rocha's told a lie about the insurance.

I know Scott lies.
347 posted on 11/16/2003 7:58:30 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
I am. Of course, this is the pre-show, so to speak, neither side is showing all their aces, nor should they.

Prosecution only has to show enough to move forward, and defense dosen't have to show anything, unless they feel they have something that can put an absolute end to all question as to Scott's possible guilt.

From what the defense has done so far, it's the roads they have not gone down, plus the "Moses supposes..." questioning I find interesting.

This hearing is not to determine absolute guilt, nor is it to determine life or death for Scott: all it is to determine is whether there is enough evidence presented to move to trial to to determine these issues. And, as we know, investigations continue throughout trials, so who knows what the defense and the prosecution will present when the official trial begins (yes, I do think the judge will rule that Scott be held over for trial, and NOT released on bail).
348 posted on 11/16/2003 8:04:45 PM PST by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfallully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

Comment #349 Removed by Moderator

To: hergus
Here's what I found tonight from that 210 page document (the transcripts), but note the ending sentence. There was previous discussion the day before with Brocchini.

1 Q. Okay. And he told you that they were life
2 insurance policies on both of them, one on Scott for 250,
3 one on Laci for 250; isn't that correct?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And that they were also used for a -- what he
6 called an investment vehicle; isn't that what he told you?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. Okay. And that they were connected to their IRA or
9 retirement accounts; isn't that correct?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Okay. At that point the -- that had pretty much
12 debunked -- I mean, you served the subpoena, and you got the
13 life insurance policies three days later; is that correct?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. And the -- you had then confirmed at that
16 point that there was absolutely no truth to the rumor that
17 there was a recently purchased life insurance policy; isn't
18 that correct?
19 A. That would be correct.
20 Q. Okay. Now, were you aware that there was a Modesto
21 Bee article that came out, I don't know, the 16th or 17th of
22 January that was still putting forth this misinformation?
23 MR. HARRIS: Objection. Relevance.
24 MR. GERAGOS: Well, it's relevant --
25 THE COURT: Sustained.
26 MR. GERAGOS: Could I make an offer on that?
27 THE COURT: You can try.
28 MR. GERAGOS: Okay. Yesterday Mr. McAllister asked
1317
1 Detective Brocchini as to whether or not he was aware of
2 that article, and, in fact, he said yes, that was the same
3 article that he had phoned up people and told them to read
4 online at 6:40 in the morning, I believe it was on the 16th
5 of January. And I wanted to tie that up as to whether this
6 officer knows. I'm not going to pursue whether or not he
7 talked to Brocchini yet. I just want to know if he's aware
8 of the article.

350 posted on 11/16/2003 8:26:54 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: hergus
Thanks, herg! Hadn't seen that.
351 posted on 11/16/2003 8:32:00 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
You have a theory on that RG? Of course, I'm curious, but it sounded to me as if Brocchini should have told SP that he was going to slip it in his pocket. Scott gave him permission to swab his hands. Then, later after Brocchini left, SP went out and his gun was gone. He didn't know for sure that Brocchini took it. Brocchini also said somewhere in the transcripts that he didn't know if he could answer a certain question, so I jumped to the conclusion that he shouldn't have taken a loaded firearm without doing some paperwork first. If you have a theory, shoot! I'll listen.
352 posted on 11/16/2003 8:41:44 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: gorbyon
Hi ya there, Newbie!
So, let me get this straight.
You signed up on FR today just to come onto a thread
that is discussing something that you have no interset in
just so you can post a message on the thread to announce
to everyone else that is on the thread discussing the subject
that you have no interest in the subject matter of the thread.
Well, hell, that just don't make a lot of damn sense, now does it?
353 posted on 11/16/2003 8:47:59 PM PST by DefCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: DefCon
Guess he/she was looking for something interesting and found us ;-)
354 posted on 11/16/2003 9:34:05 PM PST by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfallully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
The buoy I saw a picture of was lighted.

But, you know, people go night fishing in boats, so we need only ask ourselves, what does the average fisherman do? What sort of moon was there that night? I don't see why he'd need more than maybe a flashlight and a lantern--and he could do pretty much whatever he wanted out there at night. OTOH, perhaps they are required by law to have some sort of light on their boats. Whatever type of light was needed, I don't see where he'd have had a problem with getting it. And all he was gonna do, once out there, was dump the body over the side.
355 posted on 11/16/2003 10:05:12 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: STOCKHRSE
Sorry if I was spoiling everyone's brandy and cigars and dreams of victory.

Do you remember your condescending post which immediately preceded my invitation to you to "kiss my derriere"? It was pretty personal. If you want, I'll go back and dig it up. Personally, I think you got off easy.

Lots of people here haven't been able to figure out your angle. You dutifully reiterate "I think he's guilty", then you qualify that by proceeding on to character assassination of a bunch of policemen of whom you have absolutely no personal knowledge. Here's the question that a lot of people have asked: What is your axe to grind with Modesto Police Department?

"The probative value is that she has no direct knowledge of the time, place, and participants of 'Actus Reus'[.]"

First of all, um, we don't necessarily know that that's a fact, do we? But yes, in general, we BELIEVE that she was nowhere around when the dirty deed was done.

That "probative value" only comes into play if/when the other party puts her on as a witness, thus asserting that she DOES have something relevant and material to testify to. You can't put on the impeachment FIRST--you have to wait till there's something to impeach.

I don't know why you insist on throwing around terms like "actus reus". A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing.

And next time your blood pressure shoots up and you decide to make me the target of your anger, please try to keep it clean, okay?
356 posted on 11/16/2003 10:15:27 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Thank you. I was wondering.

Did everyone hear that? "Most night boating is done WITHOUT headlights."
357 posted on 11/16/2003 10:17:41 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Sandy, you sound skeptical about this David that the tipster Marietta Wallace referred to. Why be so skeptical about him, but not be skeptical about two men named "Dirty" and "Skeeter"--or "Tony" and "Anthony"--or "Doug"? (No one even seems to be able to decide what their names are.) I'd save some skepticism for that con's story.
358 posted on 11/16/2003 10:20:10 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
"Yes I do think he'd be willing to take that kind of risk."

I think so, too. Lord knows he'd taken plenty of other risks--and that goes whether he committed the murder or not.
359 posted on 11/16/2003 10:21:20 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Okay, you're a good card player, and you think the prosecution or the cops are bluffing? That remains to be seen. But why can't you also see the incredible amount of bluffing that is coming from Mark Geragos? I can see that, too, and I'm only a mediocre card player.
360 posted on 11/16/2003 10:25:53 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-396 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson