Replies

But even in privacy, WE can not allow crimes such as murder, assault, theft, etc. to occur -- it is proper to make sure those "private" actions are criminal, even when committed in complete privacy, even for most of them -- when all parties agree in some vile contract, say in assisted "suicide".

[ok, now you turn the other face and say]

But we have to give the greatest respect to the Liberty of judgement of free, sane, adults. For the sake of Liberty, and even potential Redemption, the presumption must be that the free, sane adult had some good reason to perform some questionabe action, rather than to presume in micro-detailed code and regulation a lengthy written code has better judgement than an adult. No shelf of written codes has one whit of judgement or reason. They, at best, and some are th best, represent distilled and carefully considered judgements and reasonings, but of themselves they are have no judgement, nor reason. Only a fellow human can apply them, can show reason and judgement. All respect is due that fellow human, first and ever foremost.

Are you another shill for the deathies? We do not execute serial killer rapists on the sort of hearsay that this court ruled was a valid expression of Terri's wishes. Is the right to live something which is to be sacrificed on a whim? Turn your first face, above. It should be your only face.

One face. Without decent Judges making decent judgements we will have violence in every aspect of of (shortened) lifes. That Judge -- Greer -- what a terrible, vile ruling, a "finding of fact", he made!

Thankfully Terri's family are in there seeking redress for her unstateable-by-herself grievances.

Respecting even an obviously errant "husband's" privacy does not mean ignoring the clear and public suspicions that there is a conspiracy to murder going on. Again, thankfully, her parents and siblings advocate on her behalf, making what appears might be a "private" murder, public.