Felos did NOT repeat that MS won't "get a single penny" from Terri's death, as he has said in the past. Instead he launched into an argument that since spouses are MOST OFTEN also beneficiaries of the disabled spouse's estate, finding a conflict of interest would effectively place guardianship of disabled persons with loving spouses into state guardianship.
Which is a thoroughly rotten argument, since most spouses are indeed loving and not seeking to profit from the death of their disabled partner while spawning illegitimate children right and left. It's Michael's infidelity that makes him unfit to be Terri's guardian, in addition to being the sole person with her at the time of her 'collapse' AND being the beneficiary of her estate.
THREE STRIKES AGAINST MIKEY.
It appears to me that Mikey boy thinks "to have" means that Terri is an object he possesses, and that "to hold 'til death do us part" means "strangle until death occurs". And if strangling doesn't do it, then starving and dehydrating 'til death do us part is the subliminal meaning.< /sarcasm>
Cut the guy some slack. He's working on that part as hard as he can.