THUMBS DOWN ON TRAITOR POLLARD

New York Post ^ | 11/14/03 | AP

[kattracks]

November 14, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - A federal judge yesterday rejected convicted spy Jonathan Pollard's latest attempt to fight his life sentence for selling military secrets to Israel. U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Hogan, who is chief judge of the court, also noted in a blunt order that Pollard seemed to have little hope of winning a presidential pardon.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

And how much money did Pollard receive?
Santini claims clairvoyance in his description of Pollard. Does Santini know Pollard? He dislikes Pollard so much that he even says he knows what was in Pollard's head and he summarily discounts any motive on the part of Pollard but one. Let's stick to the facts. The fact that Pollard shared classified records is known; the fact that the country with which he shared the information was a friend of the U.S. is also known; the fact that only good for the West has come from the act has also come to be known as world events have evolved, since the destruction of the Iraqi nuclear facility came about as a result of Pollard's info. It is known that he broke the law. It is known that he has apologized for his choice and for his act. It is also known that he is paying a far greater price for breaking the law than those who have given info to U.S. enemies with harm to the U.S.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

See:

http://www.jonathanpollard.org/info.htm The site is taking awhile to load, but worth waiting for.

[dennisw]

My thoughts too........

[PBRSTREETGANG]

Good.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

Oh my, we can see that Santini still does not understand what the concept of "fact" means. Santini answers my request that he stick to the facts by saying Pollard is "never getting out." It's Santini's wish that he never get out; whether he will or won't ever get out noone can say for sure. The word "fact," if Santini would look it up in a dictionary, means something that has already occurred or been done. Santini again believes he is clairvoyant. Who would think that not one, but two towers of the World Trade Center would be made to fall and in the way they did and by members of the human race. The point of the discussion that Santini keeps interrupting is that Pollard has served much, much more time for a much, much lesser offence than all others who have shared classified info. Whether or not this vastly disproportionate sentence derived from bias against Pollard and Israel would be a matter of opinion. That he has served much, much longer than anyone else is a matter of fact.

[sarasmom]

Arrangements will certainly be made to return Pollard to those who ask for him.
After his death.
If you wish to hasten that day, I have no problem at all with that particular goal.
It is overdue.

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

The duo of Sarasmom and Santini keep hurling inventive, but avoid the topic - which is: Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information, even though Jonathan shared the info with an ally and the rest shared with enemies bent on our destruction. Saracmom and Santini are thrilled that the Jew will rot. What about the rest of you?

[sarasmom]

Was he the consumate Jew?
What makes him different from the consumate Islamic?
Am I anti-semetic for calling for the ultimate punishment for the reprehensible crimes he was convicted of-because he was a "Jewish" traitor?
Do Jewish traitors get special allowances?
Or that he was nominally a Jew excuses him from punishment for violating his legal oathes of loyallty?
ZOT yourself.
As he did, when he turned traitor to his "sacred" oathes.
Oathes that are non-denominational, and binding.

.

[bvw]

If Churchill was so great why did his son kill himself?

[bvw]

Treason is had with enemies, Pollard is no traitor.

[hunter112]

Nothing quite like the case of Pollard to separate the Jewish-Americans from the American Jews.

[bvw]

Or to bring out the cockroaches of hate.

[sarasmom]

You obviously dont know what you are talking about.

[bvw]

Me and the CONSTITUTION know what WE are talking about. You?

[Colonel_Flagg]

Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information,

Do you belive the Rosenbergs might dispute this?

[Colonel_Flagg]

belive = believe.

Egad.

[hunter112]

Or to bring out the cockroaches of hate.

Nope, I only hate spies.

[bvw]

Pollard responded to the US official idiocy regarding Iraq. We are there now, at considerable expense beacuse of that official idiocy. If NOT for Pollard, our expense would be far, far greater.

Why? Because Iraq would have had the nukes it sought.

[jettester]

Your statement: "...Jonathan Pollard has been treated far more harshly than every other person in the U.S. who shared classified information..." is not factually true. Please refer to the Rosenburgs (sp?) and their dalliance with nuclear secrets and what became of them.