Skip to comments.
Court rules Ten Commandments can stay at Capitol
Ft. Worth Star-Telegram/AP ^
| 11/13/03
| AP
Posted on 11/13/2003 5:52:18 PM PST by ppaul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: navyblue
Just wonderin here. How does a "homeless" man afford to hire a lawyer to sue in Federal court? He doesn't, the ACLU recruits front men.
61
posted on
11/13/2003 7:57:02 PM PST
by
c-b 1
To: jwalsh07
Is this smaller or larger than Judge Moore's "rock"? It's a huge granite slab that is about twice as big as Moore's monument. Here's a photo of it I found on a quick web search that has a lady standing next to it for size comparison.
http://www.geocities.com/jrothra/images/texas_ten_commandments.jpg
To: Torie
I don't see much downside for the pubbies.
As you know, I favor he original intent of the Constitution that requires a simple majority for the appointment of judges.
The pubbies don't have the wherewithal to withstand the pounding of the left leaning media if they attempted to fillibuster a democrat Presidents selections at this kind of rate.
So, if they can get out of this with a simple majority, I see that as a net plus for the party and the country. Win, win.
63
posted on
11/13/2003 8:00:49 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Hyacinth Bucket
"Scalia or Thomas?"
Actually I was thinking more of Scalia. Thomas is ok in some ways, but some of his decisions lately have not apeared to conservative to me. He seems wishy washy. Reading the opinion of Scalia in the sodomy case was a fresh of breath air. It was not just and opinion on the case. It was a fight for the preservation of the constituion itself. The way it should be.
64
posted on
11/13/2003 8:00:49 PM PST
by
Revel
To: Old Professer
Nuance is like gruel; it may be filling, but it isn't satisfying.:-} Tell me about it, I'm relegated to soybean bacon and eggbeaters with a splash of caffeine free diet coke.
65
posted on
11/13/2003 8:02:28 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: ppaul
Where did a homeless person get the money to file a law suit?
To: jwalsh07
The only thing is, is that the liberal media no longer dominates. Conservatives may still try to assert that, but they are wrong, totally wrong. That is why the GOP is now at parity. The dominance of the liberal media is dead, in part because so many articulate types have found that they can make a good living taking the conservative position in the media. If you think that many of the talk radio and TV conservatives are doing anything other than realizing where the demand is, you would be well, naive. I have noticed indeed that many rather apolitical talk radio types, have since turned hard right. That is where the audience is.
67
posted on
11/13/2003 8:05:33 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
LOL, yeah I've noticed, ain't America grand?
But the national audience on each of the network news stations is still an oreder of magnitude larger than the top rated cable news show.
By the way, I would love to see Scalia and Tribe debate. All prejudice aside I think Scalia would eat him up.
68
posted on
11/13/2003 8:19:05 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Revel
I very much agree with you on Scalia. Very bright, very articulate man, and very conservative.
One thing about Clarence Thomas is that he has great respect for the Constitution and the oath he took to abide by it. He said that there have been quite a few times when his own personal opinions, values, and preferences disagreed with his interpretation of the Constitution and in these cases he had no choice but to abide by the Constitution. I can't ask for anymore than that from a judge.
The other 6 liberal justices, on the other hand, think that they know what is good for the country and I always get the feeling that their votes are based on their personal agendas rather than the interpretation of the Constitution.
To: Servant of the 9
but the issue is what Mr. Moore claimed as the reason he placed it. Thoughtcrime?
70
posted on
11/14/2003 6:38:08 AM PST
by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: Aquamarine
I don't know about running...;-)
71
posted on
11/14/2003 7:11:31 AM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Progressives- people who seek the right to child sacrifice (to the god of self- convenience).)
To: will1776
72
posted on
11/14/2003 7:15:47 AM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Progressives- people who seek the right to child sacrifice (to the god of self- convenience).)
To: will1776
I got it!
73
posted on
11/14/2003 7:16:14 AM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Progressives- people who seek the right to child sacrifice (to the god of self- convenience).)
To: jwalsh07
...the only question is what will Madame O'Connor of European more precedetn fame do???? We can surmise what Darth Bader Ginsburg will do, however.
74
posted on
11/14/2003 7:58:27 AM PST
by
ppaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson