Perhaps you could tell us how the brilliant members of the American electorate (35% certifiable RATidiots and proud of it) become capable of interpreting the Constitution. Far too many can't pour p!ss from a boot with directions written on the heel much less understand something as complicated as the Constitution.
A USSC decision is NEVER "null and void" until another USSC decision says so. What IS "null and void" is your opinion of a Court decision.
The clear words of our constitution speak to every man.
A USSC decision, if repugnant to constitutional principles, is void.
IE, the USSC cannot make a prohibition of 'assault weapons' constitutional. Their opinion would be flawed by the logic of the 2nd amendment.
We the people have the right, ~and the duty~, to fight such infringments.
Why ~you~ would ignore such infringements is best addressed by your mental health specialist.
664 -tpaine-
justshutupandtakeit wrote:
A USSC decision is NEVER "null and void" until another USSC decision says so. What IS "null and void" is your opinion of a Court decision.
--Read the below, and weep for your obstinate ignorance:
"Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.
The rule must be discharged."
Source: 1 Cranch 137 (1803
Justice Marshall
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Address:
http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/9.htm Changed:9:33 AM on Monday, November 24, 2003