Bush will violate no oath by signing one however.
He has sworn to protect & defend our RKBA's. The 'ban' infringes on that right. You, -- and he, -- show no respect for such law. -- Parse it as you will, that is a fact.
Your opinion does not make ME a hypocrite nor does YOUR view of constitutionality make Bush a violator of his oath.
No 'opinion' is offered. What you have written on this thread is a matter of fact.
The 'ban' infringes on our rights. You, -- and he, -- show no respect for that constitutional RKBA's.
Bush's actions don't become unconstitutional because of YOUR opinion. Last time I checked YOUR opinion has had no impact upon American constitutional law.
Signing a new AW bill would unquestionably infringe on our RKBA's. Thats a fact.
While opposed to the extension of the AW ban it has little or no impact upon my rights no matter what YOUR opinion is about it. It merely joins the list of laws I am opposed to maybe it is number 1,101,111 on the list.
Your priority for our RKBA's shows your lack of respect for our constitution. -- Keep digging.