To: Badray
Yeah, that.
The next question which I don't need an answer to is, if so many people won's support Bush because he said something before the election, why should anyone believe they voted for him in the first place?
On of the tactics we should use is telling everyone we won't vote for him if he signs the Bill. If he still signs it, I'm not going to do anything that allows the dems back into office. A vote for a dem is to reaffirm their comittment to gun control.
I believe during the 2000 elections, if Bush would have said he was totally against sunsetting the law, he may not have been elected.
Our work now is to make sure it doesn't reach his desk.
384 posted on
11/15/2003 7:17:04 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
"The next question which I don't need an answer to is, if so many people won's support Bush because he said something before the election, why should anyone believe they voted for him in the first place?" You can sit and whistle that tune in the dark all you want, but you and "W" will do it at his peril. Gun rights and gun owners made the difference in that election and any honest observer will admit it. I was happy to help your beloved NRA at two rallies in Pittsburgh.
Now if we can only get the NRA to honestly rate the congress critters, people might actually be able to vote for true pro gun candidates.
392 posted on
11/15/2003 9:33:23 AM PST by
Badray
(Molon Labe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson