Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
" the AW ban is essentially irrelevent to anything. Our nation and its liberties existed for almost 150 yrs before "Assault" weapons were even invented. Such things were never even imagined by our founders.

You are just simply wrong. Not only are you cluless about our founders use of assault weapons. They intended future citizens to have the same access to the best tools the same way that they did. Perhaps you are forgetful, or just selectively so, the founders owned their own cannons. What do you think Ben Franlin's job was during the war?

"I am an NRA member who believes prohibition of such weapons is not a reason to refuse to back a good man doing his best to preserve our nation in its deadly fight against an enemy as evil as it has ever faced."

Such weapons? They are needed to oppose tyrants and traitors.

"cut and run at the least excuse."

We'll see what goes down when the hand's played.

105 posted on 11/13/2003 2:39:14 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
Franklin...
110 posted on 11/13/2003 2:39:41 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
Oh, Lord spare me now Assault weapons are cannons? How much more ridiculous are you going to get? The right to bear arms is just that. Arms are not ARTILLARY now are they. And you call ME clueless?

Ben Franklin was in France to obtain financial aid and a military alliance with the French.

Cannons were not owned by individuals during the Revolution what concoction of crap did you get that gem from?
118 posted on 11/13/2003 2:51:47 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson