Red America:How Bush will likely beat his 537-vote "landslide."(BIG SWEAT for Democrats)

NRO ^

[Happy2BMe]

To all RATS, READ IT AND WEEP:

"Well, yes. But the Marist poll also found Bush beating any Democrat matched against him."

[Happy2BMe]

2004 won't be good a good RAT year ping!

[Happy2BMe]

Thanks, Geist for a great find!

(We all need some good news about now.)

[AmishDude]

OK, I have a question: Did Bush win any close state other than Florida? WI, MN, NM, IA all went for Gore. You can only pull off voter fraud when it's close. 2004 looks awful for Democrats because they really can't win any new states and are likely to lose all the close ones.

[TheBigB]

This doesn't make sense. Mark Morford says Bush's poll numbers are plummeting more every day! In another week or two, he'll lose to Kucinich! :)

[TheBigB]

New Hampshire was very close.

[DoctorMichael]

I hope and pray that this trend continues and that this is not merely a high-water mark.

[Happy2BMe]

Florida and California will be the really "close" ones, IMHO.

New York is anybody's guess.

[dts32041]

Sounds like 2004 is not turning out to be a god conservative year either.

Today's pubbies are returning to the blue blood roots of the rockfeller gop.

[sourcery]

Why is it happening?

Fox News. The internet in general. FreeRepublic in particular.

[AmishDude]

The Dems really have no shot. If Dean is nominated, he will pull zero swing voters because he's humorless, angry and has a bulbous neck. (His issues are an even bigger turnoff.) If Dean is not nominated, no Democrat is sufficiently liberal to keep Nader from getting upwards of 5-8% of the vote. There's only one other person who could save them . . . and she doesn't want to run this year because she's likely to lose to Bush.

[Sunshine Sister]

Party affiliation won't mean squat unless they go to the polls and vote! That is going to be critical in the next election!

[Happy2BMe]

"Today's pubbies are returning to the blue blood roots of the rockfeller gop."

The word RINO seems to surface much too frequently in the past several years.

Wanna know what a true Republican really looks like?

(Very likely, noone will even come close to him in our lifetimes.)

This idea that government was beholden to the people, that it had no other source of power is still the newest, most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." -- Ronald Reagan's Speech at the 1964 National Convention: A Time for Choosing

[crv16]

A state that is divided evenly between Republicans/Democrats will be a win for the Republicans, because Republicans are more likely to vote than Democrats.

[AmishDude]

Thanks. I do remember in the election aftermath, with the tales of MN, IA and the magical mystical land of Philadelphia, that when WI and NM came in and with all the FL nonsense, it seemed to be a pattern.

[Happy2BMe]

"Party affiliation won't mean squat unless they go to the polls and vote!"

THAT is exactly how we did it back in 1980 and 2000 - and THAT will be the only way we can do it in 2004.

[One_American]

Great article. Terry McAuliffe is doing an excellent job leading the Democratic Party right over the cliff. Keep up the good work Terry.

[Search4Truth]

Mark Morford's neck chain has hit more balls than Pete Rose's bat.

[expatpat]

The word didn't exist then, but I think you have to call Ronnie a 'neo-conservative'. He was very liberal in his early days.

[Sunshine Sister]

You are exactly right. We can't rest on our laurals. We have to get out the vote. I can't stress that enough!