Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
>>Dr. Clark had argued that Miss McLeod should not have joint custody because she was not interested in the adoption while it was taking place and that it was never their intention that she would act as a parent.

"Elsey never adopted this child. It's an egregious situation because the court is giving custody to someone who is not related to the child and has not adopted the child," Mr. Staver said. <<

You may have switched the names but you were right the first time. The Lesbian is being manipulative and using the courts to control. The Born Again Christian woman is doing what she thinks is right for HER legal child. If this were a woman trying to get her child away from her promiscuous ex-husband, would you think the same?? Lesbianism is a dangerous lifestyle as well.

9 posted on 11/13/2003 8:06:47 AM PST by netmilsmom ( We are SITCOMs-single income, two kids, oppressive mortgage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom
If this were a woman trying to get her child away from her promiscuous ex-husband, would you think the same?? Lesbianism is a dangerous lifestyle as well.

What does promiscuity have to do with being a fit parent?

The problem here seems to be that this is probably a very acrimonious situation. The judge is trying to keep the child from being turned against one member of this couple while the thing gets sorted out.

12 posted on 11/13/2003 8:11:17 AM PST by Modernman (What Would Jimmy Buffet Do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson