I think he needs "sensitivity" indoctrination on Constitutional law. The essential point in this controversy is that the judge is engaging in thought control. He ruled the adoptive mother can't exercise her First Amendment right to engage in the free exercise of religion by teaching her religion's doctrines to her daughter. That's unconstitutional. The fact that he used a term like "homophobic" and didn't ask for tolerance from the other party says a lot about his mind-set. The decision should be overturned.
Meanwhile, if you want to learn how bad the judge situation is, see my new post at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1021814/posts