Yes, I heard this was straight from today's testimony! It's official now. The body was found with tan (what Amy called cream-colored) pants.
Scott's black pants-white shirt was a fabrication.
Think I understand now why prosecution needs that "hair" so badly. I wondered why they just didn't go for the "cream or tan pants" evidence all the time. But here's the deal as I see it: (a) The maid testified that on the 23rd Laci had on black pants and a white top. (b) On the 23rd, Laci must have changed clothes since she's caught on tape on the 23rd with light pants and a floral/polka dotted top.
So, prosecution has known for a long time what clothing was found with the body. But if they knew, didn't defense know, too, by virtue of discovery? Defense could use that and say, "Well, she changed clothes on the 23rd--why couldn't she change on the 24th"? Make sense?
Now the question is, "Did both prosecution and defense call in experts to establish the fact that they were indeed "tan pants"?