Skip to comments.
XCOR Submits First "Sufficiently Complete" RLV Launch License Application
spacedaily.com ^
| 11/11/03
Posted on 11/12/2003 5:53:42 PM PST by KevinDavis
XCOR Aerospace announced today that it has been informed by the Federal Aviation Administration's Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) that its application for a commercial space launch license has been deemed "sufficiently complete." This significant regulatory milestone means that AST has committed itself either to issue a launch license to XCOR within 180 days or notify Congress that it failed to do so.
"We still have work to do, but this a major step toward being issued a launch license," said XCOR's Randall Clague. "It shows that the process AST has put in place is achievable even for a small company like ours."
XCOR Aerospace has submitted a launch license application for an intermediate technology demonstration vehicle. The launch licensing process includes a safety evaluation, a policy review to ensure the proposed launch does not violate international treaties or jeopardize U.S. national security or foreign policy interests, an environmental review, a financial responsibility determination, and a payload review.
XCOR Aerospace is a California corporation located in Mojave, California. The company is in the business of developing and producing safe, reliable, and reusable rocket engines and rocket powered vehicles
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scaled; space; xcor; xprize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Scaled may win the race, but it seems that XCOR may take the lead. Unless XCOR is in the XPRIZE.
To: Normal4me; RightWhale; demlosers; Prof Engineer; BlazingArizona; ThreePuttinDude; Brett66; ...
Space Ping! This is the space ping list! Let me know if you want on or off this list!
2
posted on
11/12/2003 5:55:13 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: KevinDavis
How hard would it be for one of these upstart companies to win a competitive prize for travel to and from the Space Station? NASA could offer prizes instead of some monopolistic billion dollar contract for LockMart or Boeing and NASA's central planners to create the Orbital Spaceplane. But perhaps the leap from suborbital to the ISS is just too daunting even if the prize is worth over a billion dollars?
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
But perhaps the leap from suborbital to the ISS is just too daunting even if the prize is worth over a billion dollars?For a billion dollars, I'll do it!
Umm ... somebody want to loan me a few million in development funds?
4
posted on
11/12/2003 6:30:27 PM PST
by
irv
To: KevinDavis; RightWhale
I always thought Burt Rutans' company was closer, they said their ship was basically complete didn't they? XCOR is still in the development phase according to their website while Burt Rutan supposedly could launch this year??...
So whats the real story?
5
posted on
11/12/2003 8:55:40 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: GeronL
Dont quote me but Rutan may go for the aniversary of the wright brothers flight for thier launch. We will see. I am hoping for Rutan.
To: GeronL
I think Burt wanted to classify his spaceship as an experimental craft, but the X-Prize board members probably talked to him behind the scenes and told him that he better seek legitimate licensing. So he's behind the curve on the regulatory front.
7
posted on
11/12/2003 9:00:46 PM PST
by
Brett66
To: Brett66; Walkingfeather
I think #7 is probably on the mark. Hard to believe they'll miss the anniversary because they didn't do the paperwork.
BTW- Doesn't Burt Rutan's brother still work as a test pilot for XCOR?
8
posted on
11/12/2003 10:08:06 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: GeronL
>>>Doesn't Burt Rutan's brother still work as a test pilot for XCOR<<<
That was the case the last time I heard (over a year ago).
To: irv
For a billion dollars, I'll do it! Don't underestimate like that Las Vegas tycoon. Assume at least $1.5 billion for starters.
10
posted on
11/13/2003 9:30:30 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: RightWhale
Did you know that NASA's annual budget's over 10 times the figure you just cited?
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
Yes. Did you wish to say something about this mission in light of that fact?
12
posted on
11/13/2003 10:23:41 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: RightWhale
Basically that NASA could offer competitive prizes like Congress has ALREADY authorized:
http://www.spaceprojects.com/prizes and STILL have money left over for its fruitless pork barreling.
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
NASA could offer competitive prizes like Congress has ALREADY authorized National prizes? Sounds like a productive plan, so why don't they do it? Must be stepping on some corporate toes.
14
posted on
11/13/2003 1:28:55 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: RightWhale
Yes, but campaign finance reform has been a source of inspiration to us fiscal conservatives, and a major headache to Democrats. Newt Gingrich has championed the cause but has grown dormant on it lately.
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
we have to remember that government is inefficient, remember the $500 hammers. Now do you really want government buying pills for people?? way off topic!
New advances in technology over the next couple of decades will make it easier and cheaper to get into space. So companies should get a foothold while they can.
16
posted on
11/13/2003 5:15:04 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: GeronL
>>>New advances in technology over the next couple of decades will make it easier and cheaper to get into space.<<<
They said that during the 1960's, and yet the price of launching humans from the USA has gone nowhere but up since then. With pro-entrepreneurial reforms, though:
http://www.spaceprojects.com/reforms couldn't things improve considerably?
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
The price has gone UP because its a government monopoly. Private businesses will do much better.
18
posted on
11/13/2003 5:20:55 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
Thanks for the link.
19
posted on
11/13/2003 5:21:16 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
To: GeronL
>>>The price has gone UP because its a government monopoly. Private businesses will do much better.<<<
I wish I still shared in your optimism. Have you seen the following sad story of bureaucrats' predatory conduct versus potential competitors in the private sector?
http://www.spaceprojects.com/Mir ?
There's also
http://www.spaceprojects.com/Beal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson