Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PaForBush
I don't think there are any troop transports that are completely safe from an RPG, but would you want to get close enough to one of these to fire an RPG at it??

No, you can't hide behind that rock, it will still see you, and turn the rock into high velocity shrapnel.

83 posted on 11/13/2003 6:52:07 AM PST by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: NeonKnight
That might be true if we were fighting Germans or Irish or Peruvians who cared about living to fight another day. Against insane murder cultists on a fast track to 72 virgins, your logic fails utterly. These guys are more than happy to pull out an RPG at poing blank range.
88 posted on 11/13/2003 9:04:58 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: NeonKnight
I don't think there are any troop transports that are completely safe from an RPG, but would you want to get close enough to one of these to fire an RPG at it??

No, you can't hide behind that rock, it will still see you, and turn the rock into high velocity shrapnel.

Not quite. LOSAT works by driving a long-rod penetrator an hypervelocities, somewhere in the 5000-10,000 foot per second range. Accordingly. it's better suited to use against slow-moving or stationary targets- like your rock, expecially hollow ones like a tank, whose armor becomes that high velocity shrapnel when smashed away at Losat's circa 19,000,000 mile-an-hour impact speed. But behind light cover, or in a setting with civilian structures that offer cover, or against a fats, maneuverable target, LOSAT is not the choice, nor is it ideal for use against troops in the open. It may be that a better answer is a dual or multiple weapons platform that includes a single or twin LOSAT launcher, backed up by the availability of multiple tube dedicated tank killing LOSAT vehicles, after the fashion of the WWII Tank Destroyers. Even better, a platoon mix of about two LOSAT vehicles teamed with a pair of gun-howitzer vehicles, and an antitank/antiaircraft gun/missile combination, perhaps NOT LOSAT-derived would be an even better choice, so that a potential enemy who came up with a LOSAT-defeating countermeasure would still have good reasons not to pick on the vehicles with the big long *sewerpipes* on their roofs.

So far as a wheeled, non-amphibious version, it's real value would be its relative stealth and silence in operation, particularly at night, though Stryker's reported fuel consumption suggests that it'll have a heck of a heat signature problem to deal with. That means a more realistic role for the wheelies than as the 13-man *battle taxi* version so far advanced, and a whole lot more capable armament is going to be needed than a .50 machinegun system of dubious reliability.

But if I was one of those RPG gunners trying to sneak up on a troop transport, I'd be real concerned that it might not be the troop transport version, but a cousin like one of the following, particularly if they routinely accompanied the infantry transport versions. And that offers protection from attacks from both high-speed aircraft and helicopters, too, something a single .50 doesn't offer much defensive capability against.


91 posted on 11/13/2003 11:13:35 AM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson