To: M1Tanker
I know LOSAT isn't Javelin. The two videos make that clear.
And I guess LOSAT is actually getting a little old these days. They were initially developed in the late '80s. I understand they've got primitive mass launchers (rail guns) coming on line soon. No gunpowder at all -- carry all kinetic rounds in your ammo box. All the versatility of a cannon with the bennies of LOSAT. Hypervelocity rounds cutting right through OPFOR like butter.
50 posted on
11/12/2003 2:30:24 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
To: Lazamataz
The holy grail on rail guns is to get the power source to something manageable in terms of power and size. You don't want to have a super-large gas-turbine powered generator for each and every RGun you wan in the field.
The heat signature of the turbine (or other powersource) would outweigh any advantage of the RGun's range / rate of fire because any missile with an IR seeker could find it.
61 posted on
11/12/2003 4:27:54 PM PST by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: Lazamataz
63 posted on
11/12/2003 5:45:54 PM PST by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: Lazamataz
A power source for EM Railguns has not been developed yet. As to the Stryker--it's a rolling deathtrap. Its wheels are to vuneralbe, it has virtually no armour, or fire power, and for its lack of firepower and mamour there is real increase in speed or air portability.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson