[thoughtomator]

Given the best estimation of the age of the universe, the amount of time it took the earliest solar systems to form, the amount of time it took life to develop on Earth, the apparent rarity of even the conditions under which life might develop, and the complete absence of any sign of intelligent life elsewhere, it is plausible to suggest that we might be the first intelligent life in the universe, or in the galaxy. Maybe this is hubris, but it has to be admitted that conscious thought and intelligence is a remarkable development that does not easily occur.

[RonHolzwarth]

re: "it has to be admitted that conscious thought and intelligence is a remarkable development that does not easily occur."

Rather bold statement. What do we REALLY KNOW???

There has been so much learned in the last century, the last decade, and within the last year, that we just can't know such things yet, is my opinion.

[Cobra Scott]

Adding to that, there is no reason to believe that high intellegence is an evolutionary step upwards; more like a sidestep.

Are grasses less evolved than trees?

Are sharks less evolved than primates?

Is complexity a desirable trait and simplicity undesireable, in the grand scheme of things?