Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
To the extent that any nation-state is central, that would be Afghanistan. That's where AQ launched its attack from and I support our efforts there. Iraq is a distraction with no bearing on the problem. We are being attacked there because we are there.

So, you really believe Condi's nonsense that Iraq will deal a "mortal blow" to the terrorists? Oh please. OBL will still be alive (if he is, still) and his organization will still be functioning. Condi needs to look up the word "mortal" in her dictionary.
40 posted on 11/12/2003 10:49:08 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: alpowolf
Your shortsighted arrogance and presuppositions regarding the War on Terror in Iraq would do MoDo proud.

We are "there" to:

1) Remove a brutal dictator with long term aspirations of regional dominance. Part of his plan was to acquire weapons of mass destruction. (Let me guess, you don't think Saddam had this capability.) To coin a phrase, "Mission accomplished".

2) Introduce the HOPE of democracy right in the heart of the Middle East. Please note that Iraq is bordered by Syria (A Baathist dictatorship) and Iran (A Shia Mullocracy.) What sort of influence you think a FREE and DEMOCRATIC Iraq would have on the populations of those countries?

3) Unstated and most importantly, we needed to demonstrate that we can kick the living shit out of any tinhorn at the time and place of our choosing. Someone had to pay for 9/11, and Saddam was as good a candidate as the next evil doer.

Try doing something other than parroting the instant gratification Democrat media line every once in a while.
47 posted on 11/12/2003 12:08:51 PM PST by IGOTMINE (This tagline vacant...like the DNC platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: alpowolf; Coop
Excellent analysis of the Middle East, alpo.

Completely wrong, but fun.

Hey coop - how long were you in Iraq, again?

48 posted on 11/12/2003 12:40:16 PM PST by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: alpowolf
To the extent that any nation-state is central, that would be Afghanistan.

I would not disagree, but would say that no one country over there (or here) could be considered CENTRAL anymore. The terrorist organizations are too widespread.

Were we to have gone into Afghanistan first, (which the rest of the world would have rejected) we would be in much worse shape.

In chess, one doesn't go for the Queen on the first move, unless one likes losing.

Iraq is a distraction with no bearing on the problem.

I disagree completely. What I believe you meant is that "NOW" Iraq is a distraction. Had we not gone in and removed Iraq's regime (Saddam's sons, the Saddam lookalikes (Saddam died months before the coalition strikes), the Republican Guard and the anti-air weaponry), and attacked Afghanistan instead, we would have two battles on our hands and many more dead. Things would be totally out of control.

We are being attacked there because we are there.

Fair enough. Organized Crime attacks us anywhere they don't want us. We are confronting worldwide organized crime, in it's face, and yes, it will attack us while we are they, and until we remove it. If you don't yet get it, the AQ is just another Org. Crime outfit hiding under clergy outfits.

So, you really believe Condi's nonsense that Iraq will deal a "mortal blow" to the terrorists?

When you take away the candies, the candystealers go away.

Saddam first supported (money,accomodations,info) the AQ. Then they took over most of his country. He and his Republican Guard had all they could do to protect Baghdad from them. He was being blackmailed, extorted, in a sense, in that he had to support them or they would do to him what they just did to the SAUDI's recently, and have been doing to everyone else.

Giving the source of wealth from oil to the Iraqi people, means the MONEY to AQ dried up. Accomodations are short (tikrit), and won't last long.

We are getting the cooperation of the other countries that the AQ forces fled to. Slowly but surely. Even if we manage to disband the AQ, their minions will join other organizations.

So, you are in a sense, correct. We can never rid the world of evil. Without evil, there can be no good.

BUT, we can't allow EVIL to be dominant. That is what the problem is, and what we are trying to correct, and the heart of the beast was Saddam and his regime.

We still have other beasts, in Africa, South America, not just the middle east.

And, the scariest beast of all is here.

49 posted on 11/12/2003 1:03:03 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ("Duty is ours, Results are God's" --John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson